Reforming public procurement crucial for fighting corruption in the Western Balkans
Public procurement system in the Western Balkans is one of the critical corruption zones – as the government mechanism for buying everything “from a needle to a locomotive” it has been for a long time considered as such by the European Commission, and with a good reason.
In the region with a common communist past, stuck in the transition towards functional market economy, the public procurement system serves not just for procuring goods, services and and works by respecting market criteria, but often to transfer public funds into private pockets in a crony-capitalist manner.
As public procurement, now in Chapter 5 of the accession negotiations process, is about to be officially recognized as a part of the “Fundamentals” and placed in a cluster alongside Chapters 23 and 24 according to the new enlargement methodology proposal of the European Commission, European Western Balkans discussed with the experts from the region what is the state of play in this area and how some of the challenges could be addressed.
Problems exist in the entire procurement cycle
For the European Union it is important that future members respect and implement rules that ensure that public procurement of goods, services and works is transparent and open to all EU companies on the basis of non-discrimination and equal treatment.
According to German Filkov, President of the Center for Civil Communications from Skopje and member of the Balkan Tender Watch network, we are not close to fulfilling these criteria, as the inefficiency in the entire public procurement cycle is a common denominator across the Western Balkans.
„We have problems in every step – starting from weak need assessment and planning of procurement, to setting tender requirements to fit favourable bidder, to poor and uncontrolled contract execution“, said Filkov and added that very low level of competition in public tenders, very high percentage of direct contracts (negotiating procedure) and a big number of tenders with only one bidder also represent significant issues.
Filkov also said that EU integration can serve as a transformative agenda for public procurement, but there is a problem of political will for honest reforms.
„The EU directives are the only framework for a certain area or process. It is on each country individually to decide how deep and honest will it regulate them while transposing into domestic legislation“, Filkov concluded.
No trust in the public procurement system in Serbia among businesses
According to the Public Procurement Office report, in 2018 Serbia has procured goods, services and works in value of around 3,5 billion euros or roughly 8% of the GDP.
Although the value of public procurement is increasing, the process is getting shorter and there are less cancellations of procedures. What is worrying trend is that the number of bidders, which is main indicator of competitiveness of the process, is decreasing.
In 2018 there were 2,5 bidders per public procurement, which is the lowest number of bidders since 2013.
According to Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director of Transparency Serbia, there are several reasons why the level of competition is very low in Serbia, which could be summarized into three categories – difficult formal requirements for participation, lack of trust that the game is not “rigged” and the existence of small number of possible providers on the market.
“There are formal requirements that are difficult to be met, especially by the small and medium enterprises, such as obtaining certificates or owing taxes, and there are also irrelevant additional conditions in terms of previous experience or capacity that artificially reduce competition”, said Nenadić.
He also pointed out at the low level of trust in the public procurement system, caused by the potential bidders’ bad experience or indirect knowledge that it is not possible to get a contract with the Government unless the deal is previously reached.
“While there is a legal possibility to challenge irrelevant tender conditions, bidders are reluctant to do so, because they want to avoid retaliation of the contracting authority (i.e. the Government), and there is no guarantee that they will get the contract if they succeed in appeal, but they certainly have to pay a high fee”, he explained.
Nenadić also said that it should be remembered that a large part of procurement, especially infrastructure, is excluded from these statistics, where Law on Public Procurement is not applying but specific procedures or intergovernmental agreements.
Big infrastructural projects – outside the Law on Public Procurement
The practise of conclusion of contracts on infrastructural projects based on loan agreement which contains an obligation of the country to hire a particular contractor or bypassing the Law on Public Procurement by the so-called “lex specialis” laws is commonly seen throughout the region.
This is often the case with investments from China, which are sometimes labelled as “corrosive” because of their undermining influence on the legal system, but it does not apply only to China.
“The ones who are responsible for such practices are not the money lenders, such as China in this case, but the ones responsible for spending our money – governments. This practise can be easily found in all countries, including my country – North Macedonia” Filkov explained.
He said that these projects need to be a part of the public procurement because public money is being spent and there is no reason for special treatment of any kind.
“If any other investor is that competitive as they are proclaimed to be with justification of these projects, then that is one more reason to go and compete in an open market”, he concluded.
For Nenadić the legal solutions for this kind of problem could be only found in the constitutional changes, because inter-governmental agreements have higher power than the laws.
„This is mostly the question of political will and the pressure that could be exerted from the partners of the Government, which was not the case so far“, concluded Nenadić.
Montenegro: Big problems with the “small” procurements
Similar to the rest of the Western Balkans, in 2018, public procurement value in Montenegro was around 9,7% of the GDP or 450 million euros. In its report from 2015 the Institut Alternativa from Podgorica stated that there is not enough transparency and reliability in the Governments reporting on public procurement, especially in terms of contract amending after it was concluded, which leaves open space for corruption, lack of capacities in the public administration, and imprecise legal stipulations. What has changed almost 5 years later?
“Not so much”, said Ana Đurnić, public policy reasercher at the Institut Alternativa and added that lack of inclusiveness in the process of transforming the public procurement system could be added to the list.
“Ministry of Finance did not organize a public discussion on the Law on Public Procurement adopted in October 2019. Similar happened in 2017 when amendments to the law came overnight and brought very problematic solutions under the excuse that it is going to be only a temporary solution”, said Đurnić and concluded that when the new law comes into force in July 2020 it will be three years since the application of the temporary and transitional solutions from 2017.
It should be noted that EU Commission in the 2018 Report on Montenegro had concluded backsliding because of the amendments introduced in the previous year.
“Small value procurements under these amendments became very non-transparent, discretional and with the least competition, because they were not regulated by the law, but by the internal act of contracting authorities, without any law restriction”, Đurnić said.
The biggest problem was that legal protection in form of appealing to the Commission for Control of the Public Procurement Procedures, guaranteed by the law, could not be applied on the bidders in a small value procurement process.
In the meantime, Public Procurement Office of Montenegro, as an independent state authority from the beginning of 2019, became a unit within the Ministry of Finance.
“Our key observation was that this decision was never justified”, said Đurnić.
She explained that the impact of this decision is already visible, especially in terms of transparency and reporting.
“The first annual report prepared by this Directorate for Public Procurement within the Ministry of Finance on public procurement had significantly less information than the one prepared by the Public Procurement Office”, she pointed out.
New laws, new hope?
Both Serbia and Montenegro have adopted new laws on Public Procurement in the end of 2019 in order to align with the 2014 EU Procurement Directive and both laws will come into force in July 2020.
But there is always a doubt in the Western Balkans whether good legal solutions will become a reality for the citizens and the economy.
Nenadić explained that in Serbian case, the new law brings harmonization with EU standards but also the norms that do not correspond to Serbian reality.
“The new law will reduce formal requirements to prove compliance with the mandatory conditions. Also, more procurement by the lots will have positive impact on the competition”, he said and pointed out that electronic procedure will consume less time and that more foreign companies may be incentivized to submit offers.
“It remains to be seen whether there is going to be a measure to increase confidence of the economy in the public procurement system, but so far there are no such indicators, having in mind that control mechanisms in the public procurement have been weakened”, Nenadić said and added that the thresholds have been drastically increased, so now a large number of procurements will fall under the threshold.
“Law on Public procurement in Montenegro has envisaged by-laws in order to regulate areas such as procurement in the field of defence and security, low value procurement and centralized procurement, and it is too early to speak about its possible impact”, said Đurnić.
She also explained to us that general tendency that could be observed is that more and more procurements are outside the law, especially those that would fall within the category of open procedures.
“The new law has raised the threshold for the so-called “simplified procurements” on which this law won’t be applicable”, Đurnić explained and said that the positive thing is that now these procurements will be regulated by the act of the Government, and not separately by the contracting authorities.
Public procurement ≠ tendering
As problems with public procurement in the Western Balkans could be found in the entire procurement cycle then the approach to the problem should not be partial, focusing on one stage only.
“Public procurement process is not just buying goods, services and works, but also planning, tendering, contract execution and evaluation whether the goods, service and works obtained fully match the contract and satisfy the needs of the public institution”, Filkov explained and added that prosecution and judiciary need to be more efficient in this regard.
Filkov said that looking at the corruption through the entire cycle could also help detecting corruption risks, because corruption is usually agreed in the first, pre-tendering phase, and it is finally realized in the last, post-tendering phase while the mid-tendering phase serves as a bridge phase that enables corruption.
“Increasing transparency can help in this regard, to narrow the room for corruption in public tenders, but it does not solve all the problems. It must go hand-in-hand with improved integrity of people and institutions that spend public money in order to be fully effective”, Filkov concluded.
News
Business Integrity Country Agenda – BICA Assessment Report Serbia
Transparency Serbia presented the Report on conditions for business with integrity in Serbia.[1]The assessment is based on the methodology that was developed by Transparency International (TI) and until 2020 was implemented in a dozen countries. The analysis is structured into 15 thematic areas, comprising a total of 51 indicators and…
... detaljnije ...International Anti-Corruption Day: Pandemic further weakened anti-corruption mechanisms in Serbia
Serbia is marking December 9, International Anti-Corruption Day, without progress in key areas, and with the pandemic crisis further weakening anti-corruption mechanisms. The crisis caused by the pandemic in Serbia has led to further restrictions in access to information and violations of public procurement rules. This year was another in a series…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia proposed anti-corruption priorities for the new Parliament and Government
Transparency Serbia submitted proposals for priorities in the fight against corruption to the newly elected leaders of the National Assembly and parliamentary committees, as well as the prime minister-designate, as it did after the previous election processes. The proposals include measures that should be implemented by the legislature, but also by…
... detaljnije ...Important messages for the fight against corruption in the report of the European Commission
Transparency - Serbia points that the latest report of the European Commission[1]gives great importance to corruption as a problem for Serbia's progress on the European path, and confirms that state authorities have not implemented numerous laws and plans to fight corruption. In addition to the fact that the word "corruption…
... detaljnije ...Transparency International on International Right to Know Day
The right to know is crucial in a crisis COVID-19 is no reason for restrictions on freedom of information This International Right to Know Day, we call on all governments and public authorities to ensure that the ongoing COVID-19 crisis is not a pretext for limiting citizens’ right to information. Legal and practical processes for…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia submitted a proposal to delete illegal representatives of state-owned companies from the register
Of the 34 state-owned enterprises to which the Law on Public Enterprises applies, only nine have directors selected in a competition, as required by law, while 22 are led by acting directors. In three other companies, it was not possible to determine the status of the director. In 22 cases where…
... detaljnije ...The prosecutor did not investigate whether Drobnjak abused his position in Kukulovce
The Special Department for the Suppression of Corruption of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office (HPP) in Nis dismissed the criminal complaint of the organization Transparency Serbia against Zoran Drobnjak, the acting director of the SOE "Roads of Serbia"without valid arguments. The complaint reffers to giving bribes in connection with thevoting…
... detaljnije ...Illegal concealment of medical procurement documents
Documents on how public funds are spent on the procurement of medical equipment are twice concealed – The Serbian Government marked them as "strictly confidential” and the procurements were conducted without following the law, it is shown in response from the National Health Insurance Fund to TS. Despite the fact that…
... detaljnije ...Just one point below the line
The very fact that the government of Serbia (i.e. the prime minister’s office) analyzed the content of a report related to the situation in Serbia is, regardless of how incomplete their analysis was (which will be discussed further), a sign of progress compared to the usual flat assessments and outright…
... detaljnije ...The Government should react to negative assessments by solving the identified problems
Coalition prEUgovor welcomes the interest shown by the Government of Serbia in the findings of the ALARM report, which this group of civil society organizations has been publishing every six months for seven years, following the situation in the areas related to Chapter 23 (judiciary, anti-corruption, fundamental rights) and 24…
... detaljnije ...
Reporting on police repression of corruption in Serbia October 2019-March 2020: predominantly small and mid-level cases
Law enforcement informed the public about number of arrests, mostly covering small and mid-level corruption cases, but also few where the illicit gain or rank of perpetuator was higher. prEUgovor member Transparency Serbia prepared an overview of the reported repressive actions during the last six months. The Government web-based platform includes a section…
... detaljnije ...TS addresses parliamentarians
Transparency Serbia - TS (part of the Transparency International network) urged MPs to ask the Serbian government representatives at a parliamentary session on April 28th 2020, to publish information on procurement conducted without application of the Law on Public Procurement during the state of emergency to fight the COVID-19 pandemic…
... detaljnije ...TS calls for procurement transparency in Serbia
Transparency Serbia (TS) requested that all state and medical institutions publish vital information about everything obtained during the state of emergency that was not in line with the Law on Public Procurements. TS said that instead of being available at the official public procurement website, information about buying medical equipment came…
... detaljnije ...Serbian Government Decree - Unlawful Restriction of Rights
Serbian Government decree on informing the population about the condition and consequences of infectious disease COVID-19 - banning anyone but the Crisis Staff from releasing information about the coronavirus pandemic, was reasonably interpreted as an expression of the intention to control the flow of information between health care institutions and…
... detaljnije ...Emergency procedure - why is it important?
There is no doubt that most MPs would have voted for a declaration of a state of emergency in Serbia if the Assembly had gathered, thus at first glance, in the current situation the fact that the act of proclamation of a state of emergency was jointly adopted by the…
... detaljnije ...Reforming public procurement crucial for fighting corruption in the Western Balkans
Public procurement system in the Western Balkans is one of the critical corruption zones – as the government mechanism for buying everything “from a needle to a locomotive” it has been for a long time considered as such by the European Commission, and with a good reason. In the region with…
... detaljnije ...Investments in realization of non-existent plan
The Minister of Finance announced that the proceeds from the sale of “Komercijalna Banka” will be invested "in a smart way" and "primarily in the investment plan ‘Serbia 2025’ ".These 400 million euros may be used wisely but certainly not on the basis of the "Serbia 2025 Investment Plan", because…
... detaljnije ...“Special law” discharges most valuable public procurement
The Law on Special Procedures for the Implementation of Projects for the Construction and Reconstruction of Line Infrastructure Facilities of Particular Importance for the Republic of Serbia, whose proposal is before MPs, is yet another in a series of acts that may have the purpose and certainly result in undermining…
... detaljnije ...Harmful Consequences of Non-Transparency in Public Property Management
Transparency Serbia considers as extremely useful that the State Audit Institution audited the purposefulness of leasing public property. The findings of the SAI illustrate well the findings of the Local Government Transparency Index for 2019[1]. TS found that 86.9% of municipality units posted calls for leases on their sites, and that…
... detaljnije ...Serbian investigative reporter prevented from speaking at UN anti-corruption conference in Abu Dhabi
Statement from the UNCAC Coalition Issued by Transparency International Secretariat Award-winning Serbian journalist Stevan Dojčinović, founder and editor-in-chief of the Crime and Corruption Reporting Network KRIK, was detained at Abu Dhabi International Airport early Wednesday morning. He was arriving in the United Arab Emirates to speak at a major UN anti-corruption event, the Conference…
... detaljnije ...
About anticorruption laws on the International anticorruption day
Transparency Serbia is urging MPs to substantially improve four anti-corruption laws at the session that begins today, on an International Anti-Corruption Day, so that the possibility of misuse of public resources and public office gets curbed. The Government has proposed amendments to several articles in the Law on the Anti-Corruption Agency…
... detaljnije ...Whistleblower from Krušik
Faith of potential criminal procedure against whistleblower from „Krušik“ for „revealing of business secret“ depends on several elements. First from the fact on whether the data he provided to the press even had a status of „business secret“. Whether, in other words, that was the information with commercial value because…
... detaljnije ...Report of the Coalition prEUgovor about the progress of Serbia in chapters 23 and 24
Coalition prEUgovor ascertained in the latest report on fulfilling of criteria for chapters 23 and 24 that tendency of degrading continues, that authorities’ only concern is whether the opposition will boycott the elections, therefore functioning of institutions, rule of law and establishing of social consensus are not the priorities. The summary…
... detaljnije ...Statement on donations for sport teams – confessing the abuse of public resources
Statement of the Minister of Finances that since 2014 by today two of the largest football and basketball equips „received from the state“ around 4,7 billion of RSD, represents confession that donations were accompanied by the abuse of official post or trading with influence. According to this statement, that was not…
... detaljnije ...Minister announced, ministry doesn’t know what he is talking about
Minister of Finances Siniša Mali stated in April 2019 that study of justification of constructing the national football stadium will be finalized by 10 May 2019. TS requested from the Ministry of Finances by the beginning of May information–to whom, how, in which procedure was entrusted drafting of study, copy…
... detaljnije ...Making public debate truly public
Transparency Serbia considers as inappropriate that Ministries’ and Government’s group for promotion of election process hasn’t made any effort to enable wider public and stakeholders to participate public debate on changes of three laws, and especially the media. Public debate on changes of the Law on Anticorruption Agency, on public enterprises…
... detaljnije ...Changes of the Law on Financing Political Activities
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) finds it useful that draft of amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities regulates duty of Anticorruption Agency to proceed by complaints during the election campaign in five days deadline, to determine whether there have been violations of regulations and to publish…
... detaljnije ...International Right to Know Day
This years 28 September, International Right to Know Day, we welcomed in Serbia in a much better mood than in previous year. Namely, in one of the several meetings that were dedicated to the right to access to information, representatives of the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-governance implied…
... detaljnije ...Problem of the "officials’ campaigns" remains unresolved
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) emphasizes that interpretations that adoption of the Conclusion of the Government, prohibited or limited "officials’ campaigns",are wrong. More strict regulations could be introduced only with Law, and the chances to do so, on the basis of specific proposals of the amendments formulated by…
... detaljnije ...Final account
Transparency Serbia pointed out that delivering of final budget account to the NA, which has finally happened after more than four years, is only one of the things that Ministry of Finances and the Government had to do in order to make the budget related proceedings more transparent and accountable. According to…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3