Poorly formulated provision on gratitude gifts for health workers
The new Law on Health Care, adopted as one of the acts passed through the "fast lane" of the National Assembly and without adequate debate, in April 2019, brings rules on conflict of interest, some of which are useful and some very problematic.
The public debate was organized on this act, but at the end of 2016 and early 2017. However, there were no such problematic provisions in the draft law then, so it cannot be said that all interested parties had an opportunity to declare. Also, it is noticeable that some of the changes in this article may have been inspired by the opinion of the Anti-Corruption Agency of December 2017, but these recommendations have been formulated formlessly.
In Article 234, entitled "conflict of interest", corruption is unnecessary defined, using definitions from other laws, and then "conflict of interest" and "private interest" by a similar model, as it does in the case of the provisions of the laws applicable to public officials and officials.
Paragraph 5 sets a prohibition for healthcare workers and associates, members of the public health care institutions, as well as members of their immediate families, to seek or receive money, gift, service or any other benefit. They may not seek this benefit for themselves, members of their immediate family, or natural and legal persons that are justifiably considered to be interconnected.
Gifts may not be sought or received if they "can affect impartiality or professional performance of duties", and if they "can be considered as a prize in connection with the performance of duties and the performance of healthcare activity".
In this section, the norm is almost identical to that applicable to all employees in public services, although it may be justified to ask the need for it, in view of the provisions of the Criminal Code. Namely, criminal law norms already predict sanctions for "officials" who directly or indirectly receive bribes in order to do what they otherwise have to do, or who use the official position to achieve unlawful benefits for themselves or others.
Laws relating to public service employees should regulate situations where there is suspicion of the permission of a gift or the treatment of an unlawful gift when it was not possible to avoid admission and other disputable issues not regulated by criminal law.
The most controversial is paragraph 6 of this article.
It was tried, probably not with a bad intention, but definitely unknowingly, to edit the reception of "gratitude gifts", which are less valuable. The Law on the Anti-Corruption Agency and the Law on Civil Servants also contain provisions relating to "protocol and suitable gifts of small value". Such gifts can be received and retained if the individual value is less than 5% of the average salary, and the total value over one year is lower than the average salary in the Republic.
What is this about?
Public officials may be able to obtain from the representatives of other institutions and other parties suitable gifts (for example, diaries, calendars, pens, books, ornamental items, etc.) which obviously do not have the purpose to influence their impartial treatment, and therefore there is no reason to ban their reception and retention. As the norm does not break into its opposite, and in order not to create the temptation to influence the performance of the gift, the individual and the general maximum are prescribed. It is also stipulated that such a gift cannot be monetary.
However, in the Law on Health Care, the legislator decided to arrange "gifts of gratitude" instead of occasional gifts, and this created a problem.
There is no doubt that the gifts of grateful patients and members of their families are widespread practice and that this practice should be arranged so that patients do not create a sense of obligation, and in health care workers expectation and temptation to act unequally in future encounters.
The "suitable gifts" that occur with public officials and officers are essentially a different thing from the "expression of gratitude", and could be regarded as an expression of perseverance and petty attention in various, not so frequent occasions.
For example, when it comes to doctors, it could be a situation when they receive a USB stick or a notebook from representative of the company that produces medications at a seminar, and not gifts that it might want to offer to dozens of grateful patients service provided.
In other words, it seems that the legislator had to go in the direction of educating the public in order to reduce the number of situations in which service users will consider giving gratification gifts appropriate, directing grateful patients to help the work of the institution, not the individuals, or that the work of kind medical workers is rewarded on the basis of a satisfaction survey of service users.
In the current norm, fundamentally different gifts are regulated - expressions of patient gratitude and advertising material and samples, which could be donated by representatives of pharmaceutical and similar companies. These gifts must not be in money or securities. Their individual value must not exceed 5% of the average monthly net salary in the Republic.
The total value is limited to the average earnings, but without the period to which it relates, so that part of the norm is unusable (it is probably by mistake that the rule relates to the calendar year). This is a gift whose individual value does not exceed 2.726 dinars, and the total is 54.521 dinars.
Lawmakers also voted that such a gift "is not considered as corruption, conflict of interest, or private interest, in accordance with the law."
This norm is contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Code. Namely, no matter how unlikely it will be in practice, it is not possible to foreclose in advance the possibility that someone will act biased and provide a patient with a service that does not belong to him or gave him priority in the next intervention and because of such a petty gift. The Health Care Act cannot regulate what is and what is not receiving and giving bribes, so this is one more reason to re-examine this insufficiently thought-out norm.
News
Missed opportunities for the prevention of corruption within the executive authority and the police
GRECO's assessment that Serbia has fulfilled only one of the 24 recommendations from the fifth round of evaluation in two years calls into question the existence of strategic commitment and will to combat corruption, but also confirms the findings of the TS from the beginning of this year. The lack of…
... detaljnije ...Conference: How to prevent waste of public resources
Transparency Serbia (TS) and the Center for Investigative Journalism of Serbia (CINS) invite you to the conference: How to prevent waste of public resources Belgrade, Tuesday, 9 July 2024, 10.00 – 12.00 Envoy Congress Center, Gospodar Jevremova 47 Agenda: 10.00 – 10.05 Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director, Transparency Serbia 10.05 – 10.10 Milica Šarić, Director…
... detaljnije ...Serbia remains among the countries with limited budget transparency
Serbia ranks 55th out of 125 countries in the Open Budget Index (OBI) with 51 points out of a possible 100, which labels it as the country with "limited budget transparency", according to Transparency Serbia. Progress of five points compared to the previous survey (from 2021) was achieved solely due to…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for the implementation of ODIHR recommendations and improvement of election conditions
Transparency Serbia has used the opportunity to present to representatives of parliamentary parties and the Working Group of the Government of Serbia for Cooperation with ODIHR a number of specific proposals and priorities for improving election conditions, especially regarding the financing of the election campaign and preventing the misuse of…
... detaljnije ...TS submitted proposals to the Assembly for the implementation of recommendations from the ODIHR report
Transparency Serbia submitted to the Serbian Parliament and the Government Working Group for the Improvement of the Electoral Process proposals regarding the implementation of certain recommendations from the Final ODIHR report after the December 2023 elections and unfulfilled recommendations after the previous elections. TS informed the ODIHR Observation Mission, the citizens…
... detaljnije ...Ministry of Interior should publish data on migration of voters that it submitted to Prime Minister
The claim of the Prime Minister in the technical mandate, according to which "everyone can check" in how many cases citizens change their residence, not only does not correspond to the factual situation but is directly opposite to the official answer that Transparency Serbia received from the Ministry of Internal…
... detaljnije ...Corruption prevention in the executive branch - useful GRECO recommendations have not yet been implemented
If Serbia were to implement the recommendations it received in March 2022 from GRECO (Group of Countries for Combating Corruption) – a body established by the Council of Europe – it would significantly improve the mechanisms for combating corruption in the work of the executive. However, very little has been…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR calls for improvement of campaign finance rules and prevention of abuse of public resources "well in advance of the…
In the final Report on the December elections, the ODIHR observation mission confirmed some of the findings of Transparency Serbia's monitoring of the election campaign, and a large number of recommendations refer to unresolved issues of election campaign financing, misuse of public resources and participation of public officials in the…
... detaljnije ...The costs of the Belgrade local election campaign - what is shown and what is missing
Although there were 14 election lists in the Belgrade local elections, and the deadline for submitting the final financial reports expired six days ago, only nine lists have been published so far. According to the information published on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website, the report on the…
... detaljnije ...Procurement for EXPO 2027 - no minimum deadlines and no legal protection
The Government of Serbia adopted a decree which, in accordance with the lex specialis, prescribes how procurement will be carried out and jobs awarded for EXPO 2027. Nemanja Nenadić from Transparency Serbia for N1 says that the differences between the rules prescribed by the Law on Public Procurement and this…
... detaljnije ...
Serbia continues to fall on global list of Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index
In Serbia, there is no political will to reduce corruption; the Government bypasses laws on public procurement, passes special laws for multimillion-projects that are important to it, does not adopt an anti-corruption strategy, and is increasingly distant from the rule of law. It was said at the Transparency of Serbia…
... detaljnije ...TS calls on MIA and HPPO to publish additional information on their actions regarding election irregularities
The information presented to the public by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-Government (MSALSG), as well as the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (HPPO) in Belgrade, regarding allegations of illegality in the electoral list and vote buying, are not sufficient to dispel publicly…
... detaljnije ...Alarm over indications of serious election breaches
Transparency International urgently calls on the Serbian authorities to investigate potential abuses of public office and resources by the ruling party during the 17 December elections. It is also crucial to swiftly determine whether vote-buying took place. The prosecution and the Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) need to promptly…
... detaljnije ...In the election campaign, blurred line between state and the party - a sharp and valuable report by ODIHR
The observation mission of the ODIHR already in the preliminary Report highlighted not only the shortcomings of legal solutions but also numerous severe violations of the law during the campaign and election day, among which are problems for which Transparency Serbia has been proposing concrete solutions for years. The International Election…
... detaljnije ...Unfulfilled obligations and priorities for the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December, is a good reason to call on the Parliament and the Government, which will be formed after the upcoming elections, to finally adopt one of the most effective mechanisms for the fight against corruption - the introduction of illegal enrichment, as a criminal offence…
... detaljnije ...EC report – benevolent conclusion on progress and numerous unresolved problems
The European Commission's assessment[1] of Serbia's "limited progress" in the fight against corruption is too benevolent. On the other hand, the EC report is significant, as it points to some of the most important unresolved issues, including direct contracting of procurement for infrastructure projects, illegal acting state in public administration…
... detaljnije ...The work of temporary bodies during the election campaign must be transparent
Transparency Serbia has indicated to the presidents and members of temporary working bodies in 65 cities and municipalities that they have an obligation to ensure the publicity of their work by allowing journalists to attend the sessions and publishing the explanations for the decisions they make. Based on the Law on…
... detaljnije ...Violations marked the introduction to local elections
Information about the fact that the leaders of around 70 cities and municipalities submitted their resignations – meaning their mandate ended – cannot be found on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website. It means that the assemblies of these cities and municipalities violated the legal obligation. An even bigger…
... detaljnije ...The amendment to the Law on Electronic Media does not solve the problem of "public officials' campaign"
The provision of the Law on Electronic Media, passed today, even with the amendment that was adopted by the Parliamentary Information Committee – allegedly to fulfil the ODIHR recommendation – does not solve the problems related to the promotional activities of public officials and does not represent the fulfilment of…
... detaljnije ...An amendment to prevent procurement for EXPO 2027 from being conducted without applying the Law on Public Procurement
Transparency Serbia has submitted to parliamentary groups in the Parliament of Serbia a proposal for an amendment to the Special Law on EXPO 2027 that would remove one of the significant corruption risks by obliging the special companies that will be formed for the implementation of the project to apply…
... detaljnije ...
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište the Most Transparent Local Governments in 2023
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište are the most transparent local governments in 2023 according to the Local Transparency Index published today by Transparency Serbia, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Since 2015, the Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments…
... detaljnije ...No public procurement for EXPO 2027 project
Works for the construction of the exhibition area for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure – the value of which could amount to one billion euros – will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which…
... detaljnije ...Which Local Governments Were the Most Transparent in Serbia in 2023?
On October 13, 2023, Transparency Serbia and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) will present the results of the 2023 Local Transparency Index (LTI). The Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments and 25 city municipalities in Serbia each year since 2015 and tracks…
... detaljnije ...EPS illegally withholds information
EPS AD (Electric Power Company of Serbia), joint stock company unlawfully withholds essential information from the public about its work and the possible disposing of the assets of great value. Transparency Serbia, since 26 May 2023, has been trying to verify with the Electric Power Company of Serbia the allegations…
... detaljnije ...On amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption
The draft amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption[1], presented for public discussion, respond to the GRECO's recommendations for Serbia[2] to a limited extent. On the other hand, it does not contain measures to reduce the scope of the "official campaign" and to increase the capacity of control…
... detaljnije ...The new draft law on the management of state-owned enterprises still needs amendments
The new proposal of the Law on the Management of Public Enterprises Owned by the Republic of Serbia is better than the previously withdrawn one. Still, it also needs to be amended, primarily in the area related to preventing misuse of public resources during the election campaign, transitional provisions and…
... detaljnije ...Corrupt risks of free conversion not taken into account
Amendments to the Law on Planning and Construction carry a high corruption risk because the state is giving up potential public revenues in favour of individual companies and, at the same time, threatens legal certainty and equality before the law. The amendments provide for the free conversion of the "right of…
... detaljnije ...What needs to be fixed in the proposal of the law on the management of state enterprises
Transparency Serbia sent the Government of Serbia, the Ministry of Economy and the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption a detailed analysis of corruption risks and other shortcomings in the draft law on managing business companies owned by the Republic of Serbia (SOE). The proposal for a law on companies owned…
... detaljnije ...Directors of SOE outside the reach of anti-corruption regulations
The directors of the largest state-owned companies (SOE), which manage assets worth tens of billions of euros, will not have the obligations, restrictions or control provided for public officials in the Law on Prevention of Corruption if the deputies adopt the proposed Law on the Management of Companies Owned by…
... detaljnije ...One of the laws crumbling the public procurement system repealed
The repeal of the law on line infrastructure[1], which opened up a huge space for discretionary decision-making and had the potential for corruption, is good news after years of crumbling public procurement systems. However, it is essential to emphasize that by deleting this law, only one of the channels for…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3