Research on Corruption Risks in Laws and "COVID regulations" and Analysis of the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament
In the second half of 2020, Transparency Serbia analyzed corruption risks in the draft laws. Starting on September 1st 2020, the ministries have an obligation to ask the Anti-Corruption Agency for an opinion on whether a draft law contains a risk of corruption. However, such an obligation exists only for laws in certain areas[1], although corruption risks may arise in any regulation. We have demonstrated this on the example of six laws in different areas (e.g. accreditation, rail transport), which the government proposed to the previous assembly, but were not considered by the Parliament[2], as well as in the case of minor amendments to the Law on Public Service Broadcasters that were adopted in December 2020. The identified risks are reflected in the increased possibility of political influence, mutually contradictory or unclear provisions, great discretionary powers and lack of transparency.
Transparency Serbia has dealt with a similar topic in the regional survey on "taylor-made laws" - laws whose provisions have been tailored to meet private interests. The survey included laws in the period from 2008 to 2020. We will present the findings in February 2021.
***
A separate analysis of the provisions of regulations enacted to address the consequences of the pandemic showed an increased presence of corrupt risks. This does not necessarily mean that corruption in their application was real, but it suggests that corruption was easier to carry out than in the application of "regular laws" and that the possibilities to prevent it were significantly reduced. Serbia is not specific for this, because the necessity of an urgent response from state authorities, increased public expenditures and restrictions on citizens' rights, all of which can cause corruption, are present around the world. The problem, however, is that in Serbia, anti-corruption mechanisms related to "COVID regulations" have been weakened more than necessary, to a greater extent than in other countries that face the same pandemic.
The biggest corruption risks emerged in the area of public procurement, where the Law has not been changed, but the legal notion of transparency was entirely derogated by the government's conclusion, although the Law does not foresee such a possibility when it comes to procurement in healthcare. As a result, it remains unknown to what extent other legal principles in public procurement, such as competition and cost-effectiveness, have been respected.
The parliamentary control did not exist from March to May 2020, and after that, the government decrees were enacted “in bulk”, instead of discussing each of the acts adopted during the state of emergency individually. Also, based on constitutional provisions, it is not clear whether the government was even authorized to issue decrees governing legal matter during the state of emergency, as such an authority is prescribed only for temporary restrictions on human rights. One of the decrees enacted in this way is the decree under which 100 euros in financial aid has been granted to all adult citizens. In relation to this act, the corruption risk can be best recognized during the period when such aid was distributed (before the elections), especially given that the right to aid was held by citizens who have voting rights (not minors).
With laws and regulations relating to assistance to citizens and the economy, as well as regulations that provide for working hours restrictions to prevent the spreading of the disease, there are not many risks resulting from possible discretion in determining the users. However, the regulations did not provide sufficient public information on the allocated assistance, control of dedicated use of funds and control of compliance. These regulations apply to a large number of users and taxpayers. In situations where compliance with the rules should be controlled by a relatively small number of inspectors, with no obligation to publish data on undertaken controls, there is a risk of selective enforcement of regulations.
The decree extending deadlines for handling administrative procedures during the state of emergency, undoubtedly for justified reasons, negatively affected the application of anti-corruption laws, primarily the exercise of the right of access to information. It has also raised the possibility of unequal treatment of administration bodies in similar cases, which may have to do with corruption.
***
The long-awaited Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament was adopted more than a decade after the drafting began and four years after Serbia's first deadline set by GRECO expired. The Code was adopted as a matter of urgency, just a week after publication. The proposed provisions could have jeopardized the application of conflict-of-interest legislation instead of improving them, which we immediately pointed out to both the Parliament and the Anti-Corruption Agency, and through the amendment, this most serious deficiency was removed.
The adopted Code contains useful provisions, which are novelty compared to the legal obligations of MPs so far, such as the duty to explain the reasons for their actions, to answer questions from citizens and the media, and to disclose private interests that MPs have in relation to parliamentary decisions. The possible effects of these provisions are severely limited, in two ways. The first lies in the fact that many provisions of the Code can be interpreted in very different ways. Another limitation is the fact that potential breaches of the Code will be judged by the Administrative-Budget and Mandate-Immunity Affairs Committee, while the independent Ethics Commission has merely an advisory and educational role. Although the Code was enacted to meet GRECO's recommendations, it is not certain to have succeeded. Namely, the rules for determining what is a conflict of interest in parliamentary decision-making are only slightly specified compared to statutory rules and in practice many dilemmas will occur.
Complete analysis (in Serbian only): https://transparentnost.org.rs/index.php/sr/projekti/267-analiza-koruptivnih-rizika-u-propisima
Conference recording (on TS YT channel): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izGZsZxOq9U
[1] At issue are healthcare, education, education, privatization, public procurement, police, customs, taxes, local self-government, and the areas are determined by the Action Plan for Chapter 23.
[2] Between February and November 2020, legislative activity went completely dormant, first during the state of emergency and pre-election period, and then because of the three-month waiting for the formation of a government. During that period, even ministries did not present draft laws for public discussion, although there was no legal obstacle to that.
News
Presentation of CPI 2022: Serbia fell below the hundredth place on the TI Corruption Perceptions Index world list
Serbia, with the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) of 36 fell by five places on the list - to the 101st position in the most significant global ranking of countries according to the perception of corruption in the public sector – CPI 2022. In the previous two years, Serbia had a CPI…
... detaljnije ...The appointment of the Agency's director is delayed; on what basis will MPs decide?
The programs of the three candidates for the director of the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, among whom the National Assembly will choose, do not provide clear answers to all essential questions about the future work of this body. The procedure envisaged by the law does not imply the…
... detaljnije ...Government should be obliged to solve problems in the field of the fight against corruption and access to information
Transparency Serbia calls upon the Committee for Justice, State Administration and Local Self-Government to determine conclusions at today's session (Monday, 26.12.2022, from 2:30 p.m.) that would oblige the Government of Serbia to solve the problems pointed out in the annual reports of the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption and…
... detaljnije ...The Coalition expresses its concern about the growing non-transparency of institutions
On the occasion of marking the International Day of Access to Information and the Day of the Public's Right to Know, 28 September, the Coalition for Freedom of Access to Information of Public Importance states that the authorities in Serbia are increasingly non-transparent in their work. The right to access information…
... detaljnije ...A decade of violations of the Law on Public Enterprises
The Law on Public Enterprises (PE), adopted precisely ten years ago, did not bring the promised professionalisation of management but became a symbol of open mockery of the rule of Law. Out of 34 companies owned by the Republic of Serbia, obliged by the Law to elect directors in a competition…
... detaljnije ...Fight against transparency and competition instead of the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, December 9, found Serbia in stagnation or regression in almost all areas of importance for the fight against corruption, while among the work priorities of the new Government, there is no mention of anti-corruption plans. One could even say that the fight against transparency and competition, the…
... detaljnije ...The budget shows the consequences of the disastrous EPS management
Serbia's budget for 2023 is insufficiently transparent in the part that refers to the costs incurred due to the poor performance of public companies, primarily the Electric Power Company of Serbia (EPS), and citizens are still without the opportunity to influence priority investments. In its assessment of the budget proposal, the…
... detaljnije ...Law on ministries – explanation without explanation
With this year's amendments to the Law on Ministries, the bad tradition was not betrayed: the organisation of the executive power in Serbia is changed without an explanation of how it will affect the performance of the state administration. Understandably, this encourages speculation that the real reason for those changes…
... detaljnije ...The Government illegally appointed acting officials, and the court has not been resolving the lawsuit for declaration of nullity
More than three-quarters of the decisions of the Government of Serbia in 2020 on the appointment of acting officials in the state administration were illegal. In 30% of cases, the Government violated not only the Law on Civil Servants provisions but also the laws of physics, determining that officials would…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR Final Report on the elections in Serbia - Serious problems related to the abuse of public resources and campaign…
Transparency Serbia indicates that the ODIHR Observation Mission, in its Final Report on the April elections, confirmed the TS findings and warnings during the last procedure of amending the electoral legislation and monitoring the election campaign. The final report, published only in English on the ODIHR website, contains comprehensive findings…
... detaljnije ...
Illogical and flawed reports on election campaign expenses
More than two billion dinars were spent for the presidential and parliamentary elections campaign, of and only 6.5% came from contributions and donations. Transparency Serbia analyses individual financial submitted reports and noticed numerous illogicalities and deficiencies. More than one billion dinars, i.e. approximately half of the total costs of the campaign…
... detaljnije ...Decision on "national frequencies" without evaluation of mandatory criteria
The decision of the REM Council on the allocation of "national frequencies"[1] is disputed due to the non-application of one of the mandatory legal criteria - "respect for regulations and ethical media standards", but also because of how the Law on Electronic Media and the REM Rulebook govern the decision-making…
... detaljnije ...How will the budget money be distributed for the regular work of the parties, and what do the reports on…
The announcement of the results of the parliamentary elections, three months after they were completed in the vast majority of polling stations, will significantly change the parties' financial position. In the first half of 2022, about 691 million dinars from the Serbian budget were already distributed to parties based on…
... detaljnije ...Financing of the campaign for the presidential elections
First Analysis Reports Official reports on the financing of the campaign for the presidential elections confirm the findings of the apparent dominance of the candidates of the ruling party in relation to all others, which are a consequence of the legal rules on the distribution of funds from the budget for campaign…
... detaljnije ...Fifth Round of GRECO Evaluation: Important recommendations and chance to fulfil them this time
Transparency Serbia assesses that the fifth round of the GRECO evaluation contains several significant recommendations, the fulfilment of which could fundamentally improve the legal framework for the fight against corruption. At the same time, the new parliamentary convocation and the new Government of Serbia will have the opportunity to approach…
... detaljnije ...Unjustified delay in the preparation of the law
Transparency Serbia pointed out today that the ministries have not organized a public debate on any draft law since February. However, there are already significant delays in fulfilling obligations from strategic documents, including the Action Plan for Chapter 23 and the Media Strategy. The "technical government" can therefore only be seen…
... detaljnije ...Budget transparency in Serbia at the level of the global average
Serbia has made moderate progress and is in 59th place out of 120 countries in the international Open Budget Index (OBI) survey with 46 points out of a possible 100, which ranks it among countries with "limited budget transparency". An improvement of six points compared to the previous survey (from 2019)…
... detaljnije ...LTI 2022: Novi Pazar, Sombor and Sokobanja – Transparency Leaders
The most transparent local governments in 2022 are Novi Pazar, Sombor and Sokobanja, according to this year's survey of the Local Transparency Index (LTI 2022), which Transparency Serbia presented at today's press conference. The average transparency index of cities and municipalities in Serbia in 2022 is 49 points - one point…
... detaljnije ...Six years of delay in meeting GRECO recommendations
Transparency Serbia points out that official reactions from Serbia to the new GRECO report are inadequate concerning its content. Although GRECO stated in its report published on March 30, 2022,[1] that a more significant number of recommendations were met when compared to the recommendations from the previous one, it is…
... detaljnije ...Citizens pay 15.7 million euros for the election campaign
Citizens' money for elections The 2022 united presidential and parliamentary elections hit a record for the amount of money the Serbian citizens paid to get convinced by the parties to vote for their lists and candidates. This year, the total budget allocations, which most parties led together for both types of…
... detaljnije ...
Distinct media domination of the ruling party and candidates through a functionary campaign and paid advertising
Citizens who are interested in the amount and sources of the party spending on the election campaign have been denied this information this year. Despite the newly introduced obligation to submit preliminary reports less than 12 hours before the "election silence", these reports have not yet been published for nine…
... detaljnije ...Insufficient transparency of election campaign financing
Very little data on the election campaign financing is available to the citizens in the elections 2022, as in the previous ones. The legal changes have brought almost no progress in that regard, Transparency Serbia's research shows. The subject of this research is voluntary transparency, that is, what the political entities…
... detaljnije ...Election 2022 Monitoring - TS presented the first findings
Intensive public officials' campaign, higher participation of state officials in party activities than in previous election cycles and media domination of Aleksandar Vučić and his election list through a combination of public officials' campaign, statements and guest appearances on TV and advertising are the main characteristics of the first four…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for amendments to improve the election process
Transparency Serbia sent to the Serbian Parliament proposals for amendments to the laws that are being changed before the announced April elections, which would significantly improve these regulations, and thus the election process. Proposals for amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities, the Law on the Election of People's Deputies…
... detaljnije ...The Government missed the opportunity to significantly improve laws that change before elections
Transparency Serbia reckons that the Government missed the opportunity to significantly improve the laws that are being changed before the announced April elections, even though the line ministries received numerous concrete proposals within the public debate. As a result, running a "functionary campaign" will not be prevented once again, the…
... detaljnije ...Press Release on the issue of EPS management
Regarding the issue of Milorad Grcic's responsibility for the situation in the Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS), Transparency Serbia calls on the Government of Serbia to ensure at least essential legality of work in public companies and to appoint directors elected at public competitions. We also recall that the Government…
... detaljnije ...Abolish the obligation to verify signatures for the People's Initiative, not just fees
The proposal for amending the Law on Referendum and People's Initiative, which the Assembly will decide on today, based on the Government's proposal and after the citizens' protest, contains a decision that the costs of signature verification for the People's Initiative will not be charged. The Government proposed a solution…
... detaljnije ...Proposed amendments to the law do not solve the problem of "functionary campaign"
Transparency Serbia points out that the proposed amendments to the Law on Electronic Media and the Law on Prevention of Corruption, although useful, do not solve the problem of intensive "functionary campaign", which is much more represented in the media than presenting election participants programs and paid advertising. According to the…
... detaljnije ...For stronger independence of the judiciary, it is necessary to change the Constitution and the “clerk’s mind” of judges and…
Although amendments to the Constitution lead to positive changes, this is only the first normative step. It’s necessary to change the laws, but also the practice and awareness of both judges and prosecutors, as well as the public, in order to really achieve the goal of judicial independence. That was…
... detaljnije ...Agreement on electoral conditions does not solve all the problems
The political agreement between the two ruling and seven opposition political parties and the President of the National Assembly envisages some measures that can increase the integrity of the election process and the equality of election participants, but many problems are not touched at all or are only seemingly solved…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
