Published documents on the collapse of the canopy are incomplete
During the 40 days since the tragedy in Novi Sad, state authorities, and primarily the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, have rejected requests from journalists, organizations and individuals to present contracts, projects and information on the supervision of the reconstruction of the railway station, citing the protection of criminal proceedings. The Government of Serbia, whose Prime minister, Miloš Vučević, found it "strange" and "incomprehensible" on the morning of 11 December 2024 that students were demanding that the documentation be published and explicitly claimed that the documents were "taken by the prosecutor's office"[1], the very next morning, and after the "request" of[2] President Vučić, made a decision on the publication of the documents.
However, from the very wording of the Government's decision, one can sense the incompleteness of the documentation. Namely, the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure has been ordered to make publicly available all documents that are "at the disposal of the Ministry" and that "relate to the possible commission of a criminal offense due to the collapse of the canopy on the station building in Novi Sad, on 1 November 2024."[3] In other words, those documents that for any reason this ministry does not have (although perhaps it should) will not be published, as well as those that the ministry does not believe are related to the possible commission of criminal offenses.
As a result, among the 195 documents on the Government's website, some concerning the financing and contracting of the reconstruction of the Novi Sad railway station were not published. The contract concluded by the Government of Serbia and the Infrastructure of Serbian Railways with the consortium "Joint Venture of China Railway International Co.Ltd & China Communications Construction Company Ltd" on 28 May 2018 for the section from Novi sad to Kelebija is conspicuously missing[4]. As Transparency Serbia pointed out at the time after unfounded claims that documents cannot be published without the consent of the Chinese side[5], this contract does not provide for this. In May 2021, the Ministry of Construction submitted a contract for this and a number of other projects to Transparency[6], only to change its practice afterwards.
Annex No. 4 of the contract has now been published on the Government’s website [7], from which it can be seen that a price increases due to additional works that have been agreed, but not Annexes 1-3. Annex No. 1 should contain the prices that were agreed in 2021 for certain parts of the work, including the reconstruction of the station building in Novi Sad. What this document, even if it was published, does not contain is information on the basis of which the representatives of the state of Serbia concluded that the price they will pay for the works is realistic. This information is crucial for considering the financial side of the reconstruction of the railway station. When the standard public procurement procedure is applied, if there are no discriminatory conditions, the tender would show how much money someone would be willing to do the job for. In this case, the entire work (all works from Novi Sad to Kelebija) was awarded without a tender, with reference to an intergovernmental agreement.
Although the contractor is a Chinese consortium, it has been agreed that at least 46% of the value of works, goods and services will be from Serbia or other countries, except China. Subcontractors are selected by a Chinese consortium, following the public invitation to tender, whereby "it must not restrict competition" and "must ensure that the selection is made publicly and transparently". Ministry and Infrastructure Railways provide consent to engage subcontractors. On the other hand, the contractor (Chinese consortium), as stated in the contract, is responsible for any failure to perform the obligations of the subcontractor. It is still unclear whether and in what way the obligations on the selection of subcontractors were respected, because we did not find public calls and information on the selection of subcontractors on the websites of the members of the Chinese consortium, Ministry or Infrastructure Railways.
In the documents published on the Government's website, a list of 16 hired subcontractors can be seen,[8] but not what the tasks of each of these companies were, or how they were selected. That is why most of the request for access to information submitted by Transparency Serbia to the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure[9], which the Ministry rejected[10], citing the alleged jeopardizing of the investigation, is still relevant. With this request, we requested copies of the contracts by which all works performed at the Railway Station in Novi Sad were contracted, as well as information on how and according to what procedure the subcontractors were selected. The rejection of this request due to the alleged endangerment of criminal proceedings is particularly unfounded in a situation where, according to the information published so far[11], the procedure is not conducted at all due to a possible violation of regulations when contracting work, but only in connection with omissions in design, execution of works and supervision.
The publication of all this information is especially important in the context of the data published on 22 November 2024 in Nova ekonomija[12] – that according to the CIP estimate from 2020, the designed works on the station building were worth around three million euros, while former Minister Vesić stated that almost 16 million euros were paid for them. Although the estimation may not faithfully reflect the value of the works, due to the increase in the price of materials and labor in the meantime or for other reasons, such a large difference once again raises the question of what data and analyses the representatives of Serbia, in the absence of a bidding, concluded that they are paying the real price of the works through this arrangement.
Transparency Serbia calls on the Government and the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure to publish contracts, annexes to contracts and all other relevant information, not only on the railway construction project, but also on all other projects that have not been contracted on the basis of the Law on Public Procurement.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZgSnD90TmI
[2] https://www.blic.rs/vesti/politika/aleksandar-vucic-najavio-dokumentacija-o-rekonstrukciji-zeleznicke-stanice-od-sutra/rxjd252
[3] https://www.srbija.gov.rs/vest/843958/doneta-odluka-da-dokumentacija-o-padu-nadstresnice-u-novom-sadu-bude-javno-dostupna.php
[4] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/images/projekti/javnoprivatnapartnerstvasrbija/Komerc%20ugov%20Novi%20Sad%20-%20Subotica%20-%20drz.gran.%20-%20Kelebija%2028.05.2018%20c%20SRB.DOC
[5] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/sr/aktivnosti-2/saoptenja/12775-ne-postoji-osnov-za-tajnost-ugovora-o-rekonstrukciji-novosadske-zeleznicke-stanice
[6] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/index.php/sr/projekti/187-pogled-na-javne-nabavke-i-javno-privatna-partnerstva-u-srbiji
[7] https://media.srbija.gov.rs/medsrp/dokumenti/41%20Projekat_15.03.2024.pdf
[8] For example, here: https://media.srbija.gov.rs/medsrp/dokumenti/102%20Izve%C5%A1taj%20mese%C4%8Dni_jul%202024.pdf
[9] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/images/Zahtev_MGSI_-_Radovi_%C5%BDSNS.pdf
[10] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/images/Odovor_Infrastrukture_-_uskra%C4%87ivanje_pristupa_informacijama.pdf
[11] https://novisad.vjt.rs/aktuelnosti/12-12-2024-saopstenje-za-javnost/
[12] https://novaekonomija.rs/vesti-iz-zemlje/sa-tri-na-16-miliona-evra-zasto-su-poskupeli-radovi-na-zeleznickoj-stanici-novi-sad
News
Published documents on the collapse of the canopy are incomplete
During the 40 days since the tragedy in Novi Sad, state authorities, and primarily the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, have rejected requests from journalists, organizations and individuals to present contracts, projects and information on the supervision of the reconstruction of the railway station, citing the protection of criminal…
... detaljnije ...OSCE Mission to Serbia announces winners of 2024 Person of the Year Award
The OSCE Mission to Serbia awarded the 2024 Person of the Year award to Ivana Stevanović, Executive Director of the Slavko Ćuruvija Foundation, Veran Matić, President of Association of Independent Electronic Media and member of the Permanent Working Group for Safety of Journalists, and Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director of Transparency…
... detaljnije ...Presentation of prEUgovor Alarm Report on the Progress of Serbia in Cluster 1
The prEUgovor coalition presents its latest Alarm – report on Serbia's progress in implementation of policies in the areas covered by Cluster 1 (Fundamentals), with the focus on political criteria and chapters 23 (Judiciary & Fundamental Rights) and 24 (Justice, Freedom & Security) of the EU accession negotiations. The Report…
... detaljnije ...Presentation of the Local Self-Government Transparency Index - LTI 2024 - The Most Transparent Municipalities and Cities in Serbia
The Embassy of Switzerland in Belgrade - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and Transparency Serbia will present on October 24, 2024 the results of the LTI 2024. TS assessed and ranked the transparency of all 145 municipalities and cities in Serbia based on 95 indicators,. The presentation of the results…
... detaljnije ...PrEUgovor Commentary on the Reform Agenda of Serbia in the "Fundamentals" Area
Coalition prEUgovor regularly monitors the state of affairs and advocates for substantial reforms in Cluster 1 (“Fundamentals”). In its commentary, it shares its impressions of the document - newly adopted Reform Agenda of the Republic of Serbia, in principle and in selected areas it monitors within the Fundamentals. For 21 measures within the section…
... detaljnije ...Missed opportunities for the prevention of corruption within the executive authority and the police
GRECO's assessment that Serbia has fulfilled only one of the 24 recommendations from the fifth round of evaluation in two years calls into question the existence of strategic commitment and will to combat corruption, but also confirms the findings of the TS from the beginning of this year. The lack of…
... detaljnije ...Conference: How to prevent waste of public resources
Transparency Serbia (TS) and the Center for Investigative Journalism of Serbia (CINS) invite you to the conference: How to prevent waste of public resources Belgrade, Tuesday, 9 July 2024, 10.00 – 12.00 Envoy Congress Center, Gospodar Jevremova 47 Agenda: 10.00 – 10.05 Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director, Transparency Serbia 10.05 – 10.10 Milica Šarić, Director…
... detaljnije ...Serbia remains among the countries with limited budget transparency
Serbia ranks 55th out of 125 countries in the Open Budget Index (OBI) with 51 points out of a possible 100, which labels it as the country with "limited budget transparency", according to Transparency Serbia. Progress of five points compared to the previous survey (from 2021) was achieved solely due to…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for the implementation of ODIHR recommendations and improvement of election conditions
Transparency Serbia has used the opportunity to present to representatives of parliamentary parties and the Working Group of the Government of Serbia for Cooperation with ODIHR a number of specific proposals and priorities for improving election conditions, especially regarding the financing of the election campaign and preventing the misuse of…
... detaljnije ...TS submitted proposals to the Assembly for the implementation of recommendations from the ODIHR report
Transparency Serbia submitted to the Serbian Parliament and the Government Working Group for the Improvement of the Electoral Process proposals regarding the implementation of certain recommendations from the Final ODIHR report after the December 2023 elections and unfulfilled recommendations after the previous elections. TS informed the ODIHR Observation Mission, the citizens…
... detaljnije ...
Ministry of Interior should publish data on migration of voters that it submitted to Prime Minister
The claim of the Prime Minister in the technical mandate, according to which "everyone can check" in how many cases citizens change their residence, not only does not correspond to the factual situation but is directly opposite to the official answer that Transparency Serbia received from the Ministry of Internal…
... detaljnije ...Corruption prevention in the executive branch - useful GRECO recommendations have not yet been implemented
If Serbia were to implement the recommendations it received in March 2022 from GRECO (Group of Countries for Combating Corruption) – a body established by the Council of Europe – it would significantly improve the mechanisms for combating corruption in the work of the executive. However, very little has been…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR calls for improvement of campaign finance rules and prevention of abuse of public resources "well in advance of the…
In the final Report on the December elections, the ODIHR observation mission confirmed some of the findings of Transparency Serbia's monitoring of the election campaign, and a large number of recommendations refer to unresolved issues of election campaign financing, misuse of public resources and participation of public officials in the…
... detaljnije ...The costs of the Belgrade local election campaign - what is shown and what is missing
Although there were 14 election lists in the Belgrade local elections, and the deadline for submitting the final financial reports expired six days ago, only nine lists have been published so far. According to the information published on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website, the report on the…
... detaljnije ...Procurement for EXPO 2027 - no minimum deadlines and no legal protection
The Government of Serbia adopted a decree which, in accordance with the lex specialis, prescribes how procurement will be carried out and jobs awarded for EXPO 2027. Nemanja Nenadić from Transparency Serbia for N1 says that the differences between the rules prescribed by the Law on Public Procurement and this…
... detaljnije ...Serbia continues to fall on global list of Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index
In Serbia, there is no political will to reduce corruption; the Government bypasses laws on public procurement, passes special laws for multimillion-projects that are important to it, does not adopt an anti-corruption strategy, and is increasingly distant from the rule of law. It was said at the Transparency of Serbia…
... detaljnije ...TS calls on MIA and HPPO to publish additional information on their actions regarding election irregularities
The information presented to the public by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-Government (MSALSG), as well as the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (HPPO) in Belgrade, regarding allegations of illegality in the electoral list and vote buying, are not sufficient to dispel publicly…
... detaljnije ...Alarm over indications of serious election breaches
Transparency International urgently calls on the Serbian authorities to investigate potential abuses of public office and resources by the ruling party during the 17 December elections. It is also crucial to swiftly determine whether vote-buying took place. The prosecution and the Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) need to promptly…
... detaljnije ...In the election campaign, blurred line between state and the party - a sharp and valuable report by ODIHR
The observation mission of the ODIHR already in the preliminary Report highlighted not only the shortcomings of legal solutions but also numerous severe violations of the law during the campaign and election day, among which are problems for which Transparency Serbia has been proposing concrete solutions for years. The International Election…
... detaljnije ...Unfulfilled obligations and priorities for the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December, is a good reason to call on the Parliament and the Government, which will be formed after the upcoming elections, to finally adopt one of the most effective mechanisms for the fight against corruption - the introduction of illegal enrichment, as a criminal offence…
... detaljnije ...
EC report – benevolent conclusion on progress and numerous unresolved problems
The European Commission's assessment[1] of Serbia's "limited progress" in the fight against corruption is too benevolent. On the other hand, the EC report is significant, as it points to some of the most important unresolved issues, including direct contracting of procurement for infrastructure projects, illegal acting state in public administration…
... detaljnije ...The work of temporary bodies during the election campaign must be transparent
Transparency Serbia has indicated to the presidents and members of temporary working bodies in 65 cities and municipalities that they have an obligation to ensure the publicity of their work by allowing journalists to attend the sessions and publishing the explanations for the decisions they make. Based on the Law on…
... detaljnije ...Violations marked the introduction to local elections
Information about the fact that the leaders of around 70 cities and municipalities submitted their resignations – meaning their mandate ended – cannot be found on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website. It means that the assemblies of these cities and municipalities violated the legal obligation. An even bigger…
... detaljnije ...The amendment to the Law on Electronic Media does not solve the problem of "public officials' campaign"
The provision of the Law on Electronic Media, passed today, even with the amendment that was adopted by the Parliamentary Information Committee – allegedly to fulfil the ODIHR recommendation – does not solve the problems related to the promotional activities of public officials and does not represent the fulfilment of…
... detaljnije ...An amendment to prevent procurement for EXPO 2027 from being conducted without applying the Law on Public Procurement
Transparency Serbia has submitted to parliamentary groups in the Parliament of Serbia a proposal for an amendment to the Special Law on EXPO 2027 that would remove one of the significant corruption risks by obliging the special companies that will be formed for the implementation of the project to apply…
... detaljnije ...Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište the Most Transparent Local Governments in 2023
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište are the most transparent local governments in 2023 according to the Local Transparency Index published today by Transparency Serbia, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Since 2015, the Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments…
... detaljnije ...No public procurement for EXPO 2027 project
Works for the construction of the exhibition area for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure – the value of which could amount to one billion euros – will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which…
... detaljnije ...Which Local Governments Were the Most Transparent in Serbia in 2023?
On October 13, 2023, Transparency Serbia and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) will present the results of the 2023 Local Transparency Index (LTI). The Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments and 25 city municipalities in Serbia each year since 2015 and tracks…
... detaljnije ...EPS illegally withholds information
EPS AD (Electric Power Company of Serbia), joint stock company unlawfully withholds essential information from the public about its work and the possible disposing of the assets of great value. Transparency Serbia, since 26 May 2023, has been trying to verify with the Electric Power Company of Serbia the allegations…
... detaljnije ...On amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption
The draft amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption[1], presented for public discussion, respond to the GRECO's recommendations for Serbia[2] to a limited extent. On the other hand, it does not contain measures to reduce the scope of the "official campaign" and to increase the capacity of control…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
