Corruption prevention in the executive branch - useful GRECO recommendations have not yet been implemented
If Serbia were to implement the recommendations it received in March 2022 from GRECO (Group of Countries for Combating Corruption) – a body established by the Council of Europe – it would significantly improve the mechanisms for combating corruption in the work of the executive. However, very little has been done so far, even though the first set deadline for implementation expired on September 30, 2023, according to the analysis published today by Transparency Serbia.
Fourteen recommendations related to the suppression of corruption within the executive branch (the President of the Republic, the Government and ministers) were the subject of this analysis (the remaining ten refer to the police). Based on these recommendations, Serbia was supposed to amend several laws, but work has only started on one. Amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption were on public debate in August 2023, but the reviewed draft has not been turned into a bill to date. Moreover, the report of the public debate, which had to be published in early September, is still not available to the public.
On the other hand, work has not even started on amendments to the Law on Lobbying, the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance, the Law on Government, the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly and other regulations.
The implementation of GRECO recommendations represents one of the critical priorities for the fight against corruption in Serbia, as the European Commission states in its annual report. Not only has the performance been poor so far, but the plans do not even indicate that it will be significantly better in the near future. Thus, in the proposal of the new anti-corruption strategy – the Government announced it would be adopted soon – the goal for Serbia is to fulfil only 35% of GRECO's recommendations from the fifth round of evaluation.
Among others, GRECO requested that the integrity of government members be checked before they take office. In order to achieve that goal, the Law on Prevention of Corruption, the Law on Government and the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly were to be amended. Since none of that has been done, Serbia will soon get another government without previously checking whether any of the ministers have interests that could harmfully affect the performance of public office. For the same reason, integrity checks will not be performed for special advisers and chiefs of cabinets of members of the new Government.
Amendments to the laws were not necessary to implement GRECO's second recommendation - the publication of information on who the advisors of executive officials are. Currently, citizens can see who the special advisers are for only seven of the total 28 ministers of the current technical Government.
The planned amendments to the law on the Prevention of Corruption should expand the term "public official" to include chiefs of cabinets and advisers to the President and Vice President of the Government, as well as ministers. Although the adoption of that norm would formally satisfy the recommendation of GRECO, which analyzed the legislation related to the work of the executive power, for the sake of consistency, the same obligation should be established for advisers and chiefs of cabinet in other government bodies - e.g. the President of the National Assembly and the mayors. Having in mind previous experiences, Transparency Serbia believes that legal changes should also prevent the possibility of persons for whom it is not known who hired them and to whom they are accountable for their work advising the highest officials of the executive power in Serbia.
Amendments to the regulations were not necessary to fulfil GRECO's recommendation regarding the Anti-Corruption Council – that the Government appoint the missing members proposed by the Council and cooperate constructively with the Council. Instead, the Council continues to work with only six members, and numerous systemic problems pointed out in its reports remain unresolved because the Government consistently ignores the recommendations of its advisory body.
GRECO pointed out a significant obstacle to ensuring transparency and accountability of the top executive power – as in cases where the Government of Serbia or the President of the Republic withhold information of public importance so that citizens and journalists have no possibility to complain to the Commissioner. The only remaining possibility for obtaining legal protection is the management of an administrative dispute, but it is highly ineffective. As an illustration, there is the case in which Transparency Serbia, since February 2017, has been asking the Government of Serbia for a justification study and a concession act for the Belgrade airport. One of the administrative disputes that TS conducted on that occasion lasted from 2018 to 2022. However, the Government of Serbia did not act on the decision of the Administrative Court for more than a year, only to reject the request in January 2024 because it was allegedly unclear what information was being requested.
GRECO observed that the Government does not always respect the already existing obligations and that some of the laws come to the Parliament without conducting a public debate beforehand, nor was it presented in what way and with whose influence the proposed solutions were reached. Instead of improving practice and regulations, during the previous year, several important laws were adopted without public discussion, without adequate explanation and without seeking an opinion on corruption risks from the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. Among them is a special law for EXPO 2027.
In order for the rules on lobbying that have existed in Serbia since 2018 to really have an effect, GRECO requested to record all attempts to influence the holders of executive power in connection with the adoption of regulations, regardless of whether they take place through formal channels or not. It also indicated that the data on these contacts, the names of the participants and the topics discussed should be public. Since the law has not been changed, the number of recorded cases of lobbying is still negligible, and suspicions of the hidden interests of those who benefit from it during the adoption and changes of the law remain strong.
GRECO believes that the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption should carry out "regular substantial control" of reports on the assets and income of the highest officials of the executive power. The Agency included all ministers in its regular annual control plan last time in 2014. The President of the Republic was not included in the period 2013-2023.
Serbia should rule out the possibility of members of the Government invoking immunity in case of suspicion of corruption. In order to implement this recommendation, it would be necessary to change the laws as well as the Constitution. The current proposal of the anti-corruption strategy not only does not contain a plan to initiate changes to the Constitution but also does not recognize that this is the only way to fulfil this recommendation. In addition, GRECO requested the removal of a significant deficiency in the corruption prosecution system. Namely, the Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime is responsible for cases of corruption related to the work of ministers, assistant ministers, directors of public companies, judges and public prosecutors, but not in cases related to the President of the Republic and MPs.
News
Missed opportunities for the prevention of corruption within the executive authority and the police
GRECO's assessment that Serbia has fulfilled only one of the 24 recommendations from the fifth round of evaluation in two years calls into question the existence of strategic commitment and will to combat corruption, but also confirms the findings of the TS from the beginning of this year. The lack of…
... detaljnije ...Conference: How to prevent waste of public resources
Transparency Serbia (TS) and the Center for Investigative Journalism of Serbia (CINS) invite you to the conference: How to prevent waste of public resources Belgrade, Tuesday, 9 July 2024, 10.00 – 12.00 Envoy Congress Center, Gospodar Jevremova 47 Agenda: 10.00 – 10.05 Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director, Transparency Serbia 10.05 – 10.10 Milica Šarić, Director…
... detaljnije ...Serbia remains among the countries with limited budget transparency
Serbia ranks 55th out of 125 countries in the Open Budget Index (OBI) with 51 points out of a possible 100, which labels it as the country with "limited budget transparency", according to Transparency Serbia. Progress of five points compared to the previous survey (from 2021) was achieved solely due to…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for the implementation of ODIHR recommendations and improvement of election conditions
Transparency Serbia has used the opportunity to present to representatives of parliamentary parties and the Working Group of the Government of Serbia for Cooperation with ODIHR a number of specific proposals and priorities for improving election conditions, especially regarding the financing of the election campaign and preventing the misuse of…
... detaljnije ...TS submitted proposals to the Assembly for the implementation of recommendations from the ODIHR report
Transparency Serbia submitted to the Serbian Parliament and the Government Working Group for the Improvement of the Electoral Process proposals regarding the implementation of certain recommendations from the Final ODIHR report after the December 2023 elections and unfulfilled recommendations after the previous elections. TS informed the ODIHR Observation Mission, the citizens…
... detaljnije ...Ministry of Interior should publish data on migration of voters that it submitted to Prime Minister
The claim of the Prime Minister in the technical mandate, according to which "everyone can check" in how many cases citizens change their residence, not only does not correspond to the factual situation but is directly opposite to the official answer that Transparency Serbia received from the Ministry of Internal…
... detaljnije ...Corruption prevention in the executive branch - useful GRECO recommendations have not yet been implemented
If Serbia were to implement the recommendations it received in March 2022 from GRECO (Group of Countries for Combating Corruption) – a body established by the Council of Europe – it would significantly improve the mechanisms for combating corruption in the work of the executive. However, very little has been…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR calls for improvement of campaign finance rules and prevention of abuse of public resources "well in advance of the…
In the final Report on the December elections, the ODIHR observation mission confirmed some of the findings of Transparency Serbia's monitoring of the election campaign, and a large number of recommendations refer to unresolved issues of election campaign financing, misuse of public resources and participation of public officials in the…
... detaljnije ...The costs of the Belgrade local election campaign - what is shown and what is missing
Although there were 14 election lists in the Belgrade local elections, and the deadline for submitting the final financial reports expired six days ago, only nine lists have been published so far. According to the information published on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website, the report on the…
... detaljnije ...Procurement for EXPO 2027 - no minimum deadlines and no legal protection
The Government of Serbia adopted a decree which, in accordance with the lex specialis, prescribes how procurement will be carried out and jobs awarded for EXPO 2027. Nemanja Nenadić from Transparency Serbia for N1 says that the differences between the rules prescribed by the Law on Public Procurement and this…
... detaljnije ...
Serbia continues to fall on global list of Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index
In Serbia, there is no political will to reduce corruption; the Government bypasses laws on public procurement, passes special laws for multimillion-projects that are important to it, does not adopt an anti-corruption strategy, and is increasingly distant from the rule of law. It was said at the Transparency of Serbia…
... detaljnije ...TS calls on MIA and HPPO to publish additional information on their actions regarding election irregularities
The information presented to the public by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-Government (MSALSG), as well as the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (HPPO) in Belgrade, regarding allegations of illegality in the electoral list and vote buying, are not sufficient to dispel publicly…
... detaljnije ...Alarm over indications of serious election breaches
Transparency International urgently calls on the Serbian authorities to investigate potential abuses of public office and resources by the ruling party during the 17 December elections. It is also crucial to swiftly determine whether vote-buying took place. The prosecution and the Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) need to promptly…
... detaljnije ...In the election campaign, blurred line between state and the party - a sharp and valuable report by ODIHR
The observation mission of the ODIHR already in the preliminary Report highlighted not only the shortcomings of legal solutions but also numerous severe violations of the law during the campaign and election day, among which are problems for which Transparency Serbia has been proposing concrete solutions for years. The International Election…
... detaljnije ...Unfulfilled obligations and priorities for the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December, is a good reason to call on the Parliament and the Government, which will be formed after the upcoming elections, to finally adopt one of the most effective mechanisms for the fight against corruption - the introduction of illegal enrichment, as a criminal offence…
... detaljnije ...EC report – benevolent conclusion on progress and numerous unresolved problems
The European Commission's assessment[1] of Serbia's "limited progress" in the fight against corruption is too benevolent. On the other hand, the EC report is significant, as it points to some of the most important unresolved issues, including direct contracting of procurement for infrastructure projects, illegal acting state in public administration…
... detaljnije ...The work of temporary bodies during the election campaign must be transparent
Transparency Serbia has indicated to the presidents and members of temporary working bodies in 65 cities and municipalities that they have an obligation to ensure the publicity of their work by allowing journalists to attend the sessions and publishing the explanations for the decisions they make. Based on the Law on…
... detaljnije ...Violations marked the introduction to local elections
Information about the fact that the leaders of around 70 cities and municipalities submitted their resignations – meaning their mandate ended – cannot be found on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website. It means that the assemblies of these cities and municipalities violated the legal obligation. An even bigger…
... detaljnije ...The amendment to the Law on Electronic Media does not solve the problem of "public officials' campaign"
The provision of the Law on Electronic Media, passed today, even with the amendment that was adopted by the Parliamentary Information Committee – allegedly to fulfil the ODIHR recommendation – does not solve the problems related to the promotional activities of public officials and does not represent the fulfilment of…
... detaljnije ...An amendment to prevent procurement for EXPO 2027 from being conducted without applying the Law on Public Procurement
Transparency Serbia has submitted to parliamentary groups in the Parliament of Serbia a proposal for an amendment to the Special Law on EXPO 2027 that would remove one of the significant corruption risks by obliging the special companies that will be formed for the implementation of the project to apply…
... detaljnije ...
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište the Most Transparent Local Governments in 2023
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište are the most transparent local governments in 2023 according to the Local Transparency Index published today by Transparency Serbia, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Since 2015, the Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments…
... detaljnije ...No public procurement for EXPO 2027 project
Works for the construction of the exhibition area for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure – the value of which could amount to one billion euros – will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which…
... detaljnije ...Which Local Governments Were the Most Transparent in Serbia in 2023?
On October 13, 2023, Transparency Serbia and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) will present the results of the 2023 Local Transparency Index (LTI). The Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments and 25 city municipalities in Serbia each year since 2015 and tracks…
... detaljnije ...EPS illegally withholds information
EPS AD (Electric Power Company of Serbia), joint stock company unlawfully withholds essential information from the public about its work and the possible disposing of the assets of great value. Transparency Serbia, since 26 May 2023, has been trying to verify with the Electric Power Company of Serbia the allegations…
... detaljnije ...On amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption
The draft amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption[1], presented for public discussion, respond to the GRECO's recommendations for Serbia[2] to a limited extent. On the other hand, it does not contain measures to reduce the scope of the "official campaign" and to increase the capacity of control…
... detaljnije ...The new draft law on the management of state-owned enterprises still needs amendments
The new proposal of the Law on the Management of Public Enterprises Owned by the Republic of Serbia is better than the previously withdrawn one. Still, it also needs to be amended, primarily in the area related to preventing misuse of public resources during the election campaign, transitional provisions and…
... detaljnije ...Corrupt risks of free conversion not taken into account
Amendments to the Law on Planning and Construction carry a high corruption risk because the state is giving up potential public revenues in favour of individual companies and, at the same time, threatens legal certainty and equality before the law. The amendments provide for the free conversion of the "right of…
... detaljnije ...What needs to be fixed in the proposal of the law on the management of state enterprises
Transparency Serbia sent the Government of Serbia, the Ministry of Economy and the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption a detailed analysis of corruption risks and other shortcomings in the draft law on managing business companies owned by the Republic of Serbia (SOE). The proposal for a law on companies owned…
... detaljnije ...Directors of SOE outside the reach of anti-corruption regulations
The directors of the largest state-owned companies (SOE), which manage assets worth tens of billions of euros, will not have the obligations, restrictions or control provided for public officials in the Law on Prevention of Corruption if the deputies adopt the proposed Law on the Management of Companies Owned by…
... detaljnije ...One of the laws crumbling the public procurement system repealed
The repeal of the law on line infrastructure[1], which opened up a huge space for discretionary decision-making and had the potential for corruption, is good news after years of crumbling public procurement systems. However, it is essential to emphasize that by deleting this law, only one of the channels for…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3