Serbia is falling behind on the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index list
Transparency Serbia (a member of the international organization Transparency International) has presented today the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2020. The CPI is the most famous global ranking of countries by the perception of corruption in the public sector. Serbia is still considered the country with the high level of corruption with a score of 38 out of 100 points (one point less than in the CPI 2019). With this score Serbia ranks 94th out of 180 countries and for the second year in a row finds itself in the lower half of the world’s list. Serbia also has five points less than the global average (43). Although the fight against corruption has been known as one of the state priorities all this time, the assessment of Serbia is the worst in the last 8 years.
According to TI, Serbia's backsliding in surveys about corruption is expected given that the long-standing "lack of political will" to replace anti-corruption laws in many areas has been replaced by a clear "political will" not to apply the laws. This is especially reflected in the illegal management of the most valuable public companies and in the open promotion of direct agreements for obtaining the most valuable jobs with the state, instead of selecting contractors through bidding. At the same time, perceptions of corruption are strongly influenced by the fact that the public prosecutor's office does not provide clear answers to publicly expressed and documented suspicions of corruption.
The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the situation, exposing pre-existing weaknesses in anti-corruption institutions and mechanisms. This is especially visible in the area of public procurement, where all data have been declared secret. Citizens and journalists, instead of having opportunities to inspect these documents, only receive unverifiable statements from the officials, most often from the incompetent ones.
Concentrated political power and citizens’ support for the fight against corruption have not been used in recent years to strengthen institutions and the rule of law, which would ensure a functioning of the accountability system regardless of the existence of "political will", and especially without a "political order". Earlier anti-corruption plans remained unfulfilled, and the implementation of the current revised Action Plan for Chapter 23 EU Integration of July 2020 is already significantly delayed.
Similarly, the support of international organizations for anti-corruption reforms has not been used either. A clear signal of dissatisfaction from the EU provoqued by the lack of progress in the fight against corruption was sent by the fact that no new negotiation chapter was opened in 2020. Likewise, the ODIHR recommendations (from 2016 and 2017) regarding election rules and many of the 2015 GRECO recommendations have remained unfulfilled.
Transparency Serbia has highlighted anit-corruption priorities for the period of next four years[1], as well as key recommendations based on a recently published research on conditions for doing business with integrity in Serbia. [2]
More details on the Corruption Perceptions Index and results
For the twenty-sixth year in a row, the Corruption Perceptions Index has been created by the leading global anti-corruption organization Transparency International. This year, 180 countries and territories were ranked, the same as a year earlier. Countries are scored on a scale from 100 (very clean) to 0 (very corrupt). This year, Serbia is ranked 94th (last year 91st), with a score of 38, one point less than the previous year. We share this place with 7 more countries (Brasil, Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Peru, Sri Lanka, Suriname and Tanzania). The score for 2020 is the worst in the last 8 years. For the second year in a row, Serbia is placed in the "worse half of the world", and the current place on the list is the worst since the 2005 CPI.
Changes in Serbia's score have been minimal for twelve years. With a current score of 38, Serbia is in the group of countries with widespread corruption (below 50). This score places Serbia five points below the world average (43), 19 points below the average of our continent and even 26 points behind the average of the part of Europe of which we want to become a part.
At the top of the list are New Zealand and Denmark with 88 points, and at the bottom Somalia and South Sudan with 12 points. Among the former socialist countries of Europe, Estonia is the best with almost 75, and of those that are not members of the EU, Georgia (56). Within the former SFRY, the best place achieved Slovenia with 60. In our immediate neighborhood, Croatia (47), Montenegro (45), Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania (44) have better results on the CPI list, while Albania (36) is slightly worse than Serbia, then Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia (35), as well as Kosovo, which is a subject of special research and its evaluation is 37 (36).
The CPI considers 13 relevant surveys that measure the perception of corruption in the public sector. These researches represent the opinion or impression about the corruption of government officials and public servants by those who do business with them or who advise business people, government and international institutions. Researches capture perceptions of corruption within the past two years and there must be at least three such sources of data for any country / territory to be ranked.
This year, Serbia is included in a total of eight relevant surveys (same as for 2019), which guarantees an even higher degree of reliability of the findings, as well as comparability of data with those from previous years. Global Insight Country Risk Ratings, Bertelsmann Foundation, World Economic Forum, Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, International Country Risk Guide, World Justice Project Rule of Law Index and Varieties of Democracy Project were used for this purpose.
Of the surveys relevant to Serbia, in five cases data were collected in 2019, in one case during 2019 and 2020, while in two cases the researches were fully conducted in 2020. In two cases the same source was used as for CPI 2019, because no new data were published, in four cases the researchers rated the state of affairs as the same as in previous year, and in two researches conducted during 2020, the ratings were worse.
Ratings from individual surveys range from 35.28 to 40.72. The standard deviation is (1.66).
In this year's report, Transparency International highlighted the impact of the COVID pandemic on corruption risks. Corruption itself can endanger people's lives, and the danger increases significantly when corruption is "associated" with other health risks, such as corona virus. The less corruption in the public sector, the more money there will be to invest in health care, noted Transparency International, citing Uruguay as a good example. Uruguay has the highest CPI Index in Latin America (71) and invests huge funds in health care, and as a result a system of epidemiological surveillance in that country responded excellently to the appearance of the corona virus.
Bangladesh is on the flip side of the coin (CPI 26), with corruption flourishing during the pandemic - from bribery in health facilities to corruption in the distribution of aid and procurement of medical supplies. TI points out, however, that the United States also has the worst score since 2012 (67) and that the focus was, among other, on the weak control over distribution of a $1,000 billion pandemic aid package.
Transparency Serbia
Belgrade,
28 January 2021.
[1] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/images/dokumenti_uz_vesti/Prioriteti_u_borbi_protiv_korupcije_u_Srbiji.pdf
[2] https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/images/dokumenti_uz_vesti/BICA_SRB_ONLINE.pdf
News
Presentation of CPI 2022: Serbia fell below the hundredth place on the TI Corruption Perceptions Index world list
Serbia, with the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) of 36 fell by five places on the list - to the 101st position in the most significant global ranking of countries according to the perception of corruption in the public sector – CPI 2022. In the previous two years, Serbia had a CPI…
... detaljnije ...The appointment of the Agency's director is delayed; on what basis will MPs decide?
The programs of the three candidates for the director of the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, among whom the National Assembly will choose, do not provide clear answers to all essential questions about the future work of this body. The procedure envisaged by the law does not imply the…
... detaljnije ...Government should be obliged to solve problems in the field of the fight against corruption and access to information
Transparency Serbia calls upon the Committee for Justice, State Administration and Local Self-Government to determine conclusions at today's session (Monday, 26.12.2022, from 2:30 p.m.) that would oblige the Government of Serbia to solve the problems pointed out in the annual reports of the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption and…
... detaljnije ...The Coalition expresses its concern about the growing non-transparency of institutions
On the occasion of marking the International Day of Access to Information and the Day of the Public's Right to Know, 28 September, the Coalition for Freedom of Access to Information of Public Importance states that the authorities in Serbia are increasingly non-transparent in their work. The right to access information…
... detaljnije ...A decade of violations of the Law on Public Enterprises
The Law on Public Enterprises (PE), adopted precisely ten years ago, did not bring the promised professionalisation of management but became a symbol of open mockery of the rule of Law. Out of 34 companies owned by the Republic of Serbia, obliged by the Law to elect directors in a competition…
... detaljnije ...Fight against transparency and competition instead of the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, December 9, found Serbia in stagnation or regression in almost all areas of importance for the fight against corruption, while among the work priorities of the new Government, there is no mention of anti-corruption plans. One could even say that the fight against transparency and competition, the…
... detaljnije ...The budget shows the consequences of the disastrous EPS management
Serbia's budget for 2023 is insufficiently transparent in the part that refers to the costs incurred due to the poor performance of public companies, primarily the Electric Power Company of Serbia (EPS), and citizens are still without the opportunity to influence priority investments. In its assessment of the budget proposal, the…
... detaljnije ...Law on ministries – explanation without explanation
With this year's amendments to the Law on Ministries, the bad tradition was not betrayed: the organisation of the executive power in Serbia is changed without an explanation of how it will affect the performance of the state administration. Understandably, this encourages speculation that the real reason for those changes…
... detaljnije ...The Government illegally appointed acting officials, and the court has not been resolving the lawsuit for declaration of nullity
More than three-quarters of the decisions of the Government of Serbia in 2020 on the appointment of acting officials in the state administration were illegal. In 30% of cases, the Government violated not only the Law on Civil Servants provisions but also the laws of physics, determining that officials would…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR Final Report on the elections in Serbia - Serious problems related to the abuse of public resources and campaign…
Transparency Serbia indicates that the ODIHR Observation Mission, in its Final Report on the April elections, confirmed the TS findings and warnings during the last procedure of amending the electoral legislation and monitoring the election campaign. The final report, published only in English on the ODIHR website, contains comprehensive findings…
... detaljnije ...
Illogical and flawed reports on election campaign expenses
More than two billion dinars were spent for the presidential and parliamentary elections campaign, of and only 6.5% came from contributions and donations. Transparency Serbia analyses individual financial submitted reports and noticed numerous illogicalities and deficiencies. More than one billion dinars, i.e. approximately half of the total costs of the campaign…
... detaljnije ...Decision on "national frequencies" without evaluation of mandatory criteria
The decision of the REM Council on the allocation of "national frequencies"[1] is disputed due to the non-application of one of the mandatory legal criteria - "respect for regulations and ethical media standards", but also because of how the Law on Electronic Media and the REM Rulebook govern the decision-making…
... detaljnije ...How will the budget money be distributed for the regular work of the parties, and what do the reports on…
The announcement of the results of the parliamentary elections, three months after they were completed in the vast majority of polling stations, will significantly change the parties' financial position. In the first half of 2022, about 691 million dinars from the Serbian budget were already distributed to parties based on…
... detaljnije ...Financing of the campaign for the presidential elections
First Analysis Reports Official reports on the financing of the campaign for the presidential elections confirm the findings of the apparent dominance of the candidates of the ruling party in relation to all others, which are a consequence of the legal rules on the distribution of funds from the budget for campaign…
... detaljnije ...Fifth Round of GRECO Evaluation: Important recommendations and chance to fulfil them this time
Transparency Serbia assesses that the fifth round of the GRECO evaluation contains several significant recommendations, the fulfilment of which could fundamentally improve the legal framework for the fight against corruption. At the same time, the new parliamentary convocation and the new Government of Serbia will have the opportunity to approach…
... detaljnije ...Unjustified delay in the preparation of the law
Transparency Serbia pointed out today that the ministries have not organized a public debate on any draft law since February. However, there are already significant delays in fulfilling obligations from strategic documents, including the Action Plan for Chapter 23 and the Media Strategy. The "technical government" can therefore only be seen…
... detaljnije ...Budget transparency in Serbia at the level of the global average
Serbia has made moderate progress and is in 59th place out of 120 countries in the international Open Budget Index (OBI) survey with 46 points out of a possible 100, which ranks it among countries with "limited budget transparency". An improvement of six points compared to the previous survey (from 2019)…
... detaljnije ...LTI 2022: Novi Pazar, Sombor and Sokobanja – Transparency Leaders
The most transparent local governments in 2022 are Novi Pazar, Sombor and Sokobanja, according to this year's survey of the Local Transparency Index (LTI 2022), which Transparency Serbia presented at today's press conference. The average transparency index of cities and municipalities in Serbia in 2022 is 49 points - one point…
... detaljnije ...Six years of delay in meeting GRECO recommendations
Transparency Serbia points out that official reactions from Serbia to the new GRECO report are inadequate concerning its content. Although GRECO stated in its report published on March 30, 2022,[1] that a more significant number of recommendations were met when compared to the recommendations from the previous one, it is…
... detaljnije ...Citizens pay 15.7 million euros for the election campaign
Citizens' money for elections The 2022 united presidential and parliamentary elections hit a record for the amount of money the Serbian citizens paid to get convinced by the parties to vote for their lists and candidates. This year, the total budget allocations, which most parties led together for both types of…
... detaljnije ...
Distinct media domination of the ruling party and candidates through a functionary campaign and paid advertising
Citizens who are interested in the amount and sources of the party spending on the election campaign have been denied this information this year. Despite the newly introduced obligation to submit preliminary reports less than 12 hours before the "election silence", these reports have not yet been published for nine…
... detaljnije ...Insufficient transparency of election campaign financing
Very little data on the election campaign financing is available to the citizens in the elections 2022, as in the previous ones. The legal changes have brought almost no progress in that regard, Transparency Serbia's research shows. The subject of this research is voluntary transparency, that is, what the political entities…
... detaljnije ...Election 2022 Monitoring - TS presented the first findings
Intensive public officials' campaign, higher participation of state officials in party activities than in previous election cycles and media domination of Aleksandar Vučić and his election list through a combination of public officials' campaign, statements and guest appearances on TV and advertising are the main characteristics of the first four…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for amendments to improve the election process
Transparency Serbia sent to the Serbian Parliament proposals for amendments to the laws that are being changed before the announced April elections, which would significantly improve these regulations, and thus the election process. Proposals for amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities, the Law on the Election of People's Deputies…
... detaljnije ...The Government missed the opportunity to significantly improve laws that change before elections
Transparency Serbia reckons that the Government missed the opportunity to significantly improve the laws that are being changed before the announced April elections, even though the line ministries received numerous concrete proposals within the public debate. As a result, running a "functionary campaign" will not be prevented once again, the…
... detaljnije ...Press Release on the issue of EPS management
Regarding the issue of Milorad Grcic's responsibility for the situation in the Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS), Transparency Serbia calls on the Government of Serbia to ensure at least essential legality of work in public companies and to appoint directors elected at public competitions. We also recall that the Government…
... detaljnije ...Abolish the obligation to verify signatures for the People's Initiative, not just fees
The proposal for amending the Law on Referendum and People's Initiative, which the Assembly will decide on today, based on the Government's proposal and after the citizens' protest, contains a decision that the costs of signature verification for the People's Initiative will not be charged. The Government proposed a solution…
... detaljnije ...Proposed amendments to the law do not solve the problem of "functionary campaign"
Transparency Serbia points out that the proposed amendments to the Law on Electronic Media and the Law on Prevention of Corruption, although useful, do not solve the problem of intensive "functionary campaign", which is much more represented in the media than presenting election participants programs and paid advertising. According to the…
... detaljnije ...For stronger independence of the judiciary, it is necessary to change the Constitution and the “clerk’s mind” of judges and…
Although amendments to the Constitution lead to positive changes, this is only the first normative step. It’s necessary to change the laws, but also the practice and awareness of both judges and prosecutors, as well as the public, in order to really achieve the goal of judicial independence. That was…
... detaljnije ...Agreement on electoral conditions does not solve all the problems
The political agreement between the two ruling and seven opposition political parties and the President of the National Assembly envisages some measures that can increase the integrity of the election process and the equality of election participants, but many problems are not touched at all or are only seemingly solved…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
