The state administration is still in the “acting” condition
The Government of Serbia has continued to appoint acting officials this year, bringing by the end of May 2020 a total of 233 decions extending the acting status of 21 existing staff for six months and 212 for another three months.
Serbia ended the previous year with just over a third of the heads of state administration appointed by the government after the competition, while the rest are acting officials. Although this indicates a slight improvement (about 5%) compared to the situation at the end of 2018, it is evident that the government systematically applies the practice of appointing easily replaceable acting officials instead of professionals whose dismissal would require arguments.
At the end of 2018, out of 370 positions in the state administration, 107 officials were appointed based on previously conducted public and internal competitions, as stated in the report of the Negotiating Group for Chapter 23.[1] In 2019, the government announced only 42 vacancies for assistant ministers, secretaries of Ministries, directors and other heads of government offices, administrations and special organisations. At the end of 2018, acting officials occupied 263 positions, which means that in 2019 government did not even try to fill these positions through competition in 221 cases.
Out of 42 competitions for positions, the Ministry of Finance announced 12, five ministries had two competitions each, and other state administration bodies announced the rest. Based on these 42 competitions and those conducted in previous years, only 21 employees were appointed in 2019. Thus, at the end of 2019, there were approximately 242 positions occupied by incumbents, i.e. 65.4% of the total. The data is approximate because there is a possibility that there were changes in the organisational structure of administrative bodies and a decrease or (more likely) an increase in the number of positions.
Beginning on 3 June, 2020,[2] bearing in mind the provisions of Article 16, p. 3. and Article 17. P. 2 of the Law on Government[3], the authority of the government to appoint civil servants to positions in the state administration, including acting ones, is also disputable, so it can be expected that many of these positions will remain vacant until the formation of a new government after elections.
During 2019 and 2020, the Negotiating Group for Chapter 23 EU Integration and other state bodies did not publish aggregate data on appointments. Transparency Serbia, based on numerous individual decisions on the appointment of acting officials made by the government last year, determined that about two-thirds of state administration bodies in the Republic of Serbia still do not have managers elected at the competition. Moreover, it is likely that many of them no longer have legal executives.
Therefore, the Government of Serbia is still deaf to the law passed in 2005 and the action plans and messages of the European Union on changing the practice of appointing acting officials. Because of these messages, the government set a deadline to resolve the illegal conditions with acting officials by 30 June 2019. Still, after that date, the government continued to appoint acting officials even more enthusiastically. Such a practice was accompanied by the Prime Minister statements indicating that harmonising the situation with the law was not a priority but that this type of political control over the public administration is considered a good practice.[4]
In the second half of last year, almost twice as many decisions were made on the appointment of acting officials compared to the first six months of 2019. According to the law, until a civil servant is appointed, one or more acting officials can be appointed for a total period of up to 6 months without a competition (Article 67a), which the government applied, passing 211 decisions for six months, and 41 decisions for another three months. Such a large number of acting officials’ appointments is related to the fact that by the force of law, on 30 June 2019, the mandate of all those who held positions as acting officials at that time ended.
One acting official’s case (Secretary of the Ministry of Health) is particularly interesting. For this person, five decisions were made for appointment to that position during 2019, each lasting three months, although three of them are “subsequent” and refer to that person’s appointment in 2018. (June, September and December).
At the beginning of July, the government passed a decision on the appointment of the Acting Director of the Government of Serbia’s Aviation Service and at the very last session in 2019, it decided to extend his status for another six months.
Transparency - Serbia points out that a major problem, in addition to all mentioned above, is the lack of data on fulfilling the government’s obligation. Namely, the single list of civil servants set by the government has not been published yet. We emphasise that Serbian citizens can obtain complete information only by a detailed search of data from each government session, announced vacancies and regulations on job systematisation or information on the work of each of several dozen state administration bodies, provided they are published and up to date. Our organisation did not receive such a list even after several requests for free access to information [6], although it is evident that it should exist.
At the same time, we recall that such a severe blow to the rule of law is unfortunately not an isolated case. Namely, the situation with acting officials, which facilitates direct control of public sector institutions by the political leadership, and contrary to legal provisions, exists in many state-owned enterprises.
Transparency Serbia published texts of all decisions on the appointment of acting officials[5] and their classification[6] according to the legal grounds for the appointments.
[1]https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/files/08.02.%20Action%20plan%20for%20Chapter%2023%20with%20implementation%20status%20on%2031st%20December%202018-%20finalno.docx
[2] https://www.istinomer.rs/analize/hoce-li-skupstina-srbije-biti-nelegalna-posle-3-juna/
[3] https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/2994/file/Law%20on%20the%20Government.pdf
[4] https://pescanik.net/u-srbiji-zakoni-ne-garantuju-nista/
[5]https://transparentnost.org.rs/images/dokumenti_uz_vesti/TS_resenja_Vlade_o_postavljanju_sluzbenika_na_polozaje_u_drugoj_polovini_2019.docx
[6]https://transparentnost.org.rs/images/dokumenti_uz_vesti/TS_postavljanje_vrsilaca_duznosti_na_polozaje_u_drzavnoj_upravi_2019.xlsx
News
Presentation of the Local Self-Government Transparency Index - LTI 2024 - The Most Transparent Municipalities and Cities in Serbia
The Embassy of Switzerland in Belgrade - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and Transparency Serbia will present on October 24, 2024 the results of the LTI 2024. TS assessed and ranked the transparency of all 145 municipalities and cities in Serbia based on 95 indicators,. The presentation of the results…
... detaljnije ...PrEUgovor Commentary on the Reform Agenda of Serbia in the "Fundamentals" Area
Coalition prEUgovor regularly monitors the state of affairs and advocates for substantial reforms in Cluster 1 (“Fundamentals”). In its commentary, it shares its impressions of the document - newly adopted Reform Agenda of the Republic of Serbia, in principle and in selected areas it monitors within the Fundamentals. For 21 measures within the section…
... detaljnije ...Missed opportunities for the prevention of corruption within the executive authority and the police
GRECO's assessment that Serbia has fulfilled only one of the 24 recommendations from the fifth round of evaluation in two years calls into question the existence of strategic commitment and will to combat corruption, but also confirms the findings of the TS from the beginning of this year. The lack of…
... detaljnije ...Conference: How to prevent waste of public resources
Transparency Serbia (TS) and the Center for Investigative Journalism of Serbia (CINS) invite you to the conference: How to prevent waste of public resources Belgrade, Tuesday, 9 July 2024, 10.00 – 12.00 Envoy Congress Center, Gospodar Jevremova 47 Agenda: 10.00 – 10.05 Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director, Transparency Serbia 10.05 – 10.10 Milica Šarić, Director…
... detaljnije ...Serbia remains among the countries with limited budget transparency
Serbia ranks 55th out of 125 countries in the Open Budget Index (OBI) with 51 points out of a possible 100, which labels it as the country with "limited budget transparency", according to Transparency Serbia. Progress of five points compared to the previous survey (from 2021) was achieved solely due to…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for the implementation of ODIHR recommendations and improvement of election conditions
Transparency Serbia has used the opportunity to present to representatives of parliamentary parties and the Working Group of the Government of Serbia for Cooperation with ODIHR a number of specific proposals and priorities for improving election conditions, especially regarding the financing of the election campaign and preventing the misuse of…
... detaljnije ...TS submitted proposals to the Assembly for the implementation of recommendations from the ODIHR report
Transparency Serbia submitted to the Serbian Parliament and the Government Working Group for the Improvement of the Electoral Process proposals regarding the implementation of certain recommendations from the Final ODIHR report after the December 2023 elections and unfulfilled recommendations after the previous elections. TS informed the ODIHR Observation Mission, the citizens…
... detaljnije ...Ministry of Interior should publish data on migration of voters that it submitted to Prime Minister
The claim of the Prime Minister in the technical mandate, according to which "everyone can check" in how many cases citizens change their residence, not only does not correspond to the factual situation but is directly opposite to the official answer that Transparency Serbia received from the Ministry of Internal…
... detaljnije ...Corruption prevention in the executive branch - useful GRECO recommendations have not yet been implemented
If Serbia were to implement the recommendations it received in March 2022 from GRECO (Group of Countries for Combating Corruption) – a body established by the Council of Europe – it would significantly improve the mechanisms for combating corruption in the work of the executive. However, very little has been…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR calls for improvement of campaign finance rules and prevention of abuse of public resources "well in advance of the…
In the final Report on the December elections, the ODIHR observation mission confirmed some of the findings of Transparency Serbia's monitoring of the election campaign, and a large number of recommendations refer to unresolved issues of election campaign financing, misuse of public resources and participation of public officials in the…
... detaljnije ...
The costs of the Belgrade local election campaign - what is shown and what is missing
Although there were 14 election lists in the Belgrade local elections, and the deadline for submitting the final financial reports expired six days ago, only nine lists have been published so far. According to the information published on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website, the report on the…
... detaljnije ...Procurement for EXPO 2027 - no minimum deadlines and no legal protection
The Government of Serbia adopted a decree which, in accordance with the lex specialis, prescribes how procurement will be carried out and jobs awarded for EXPO 2027. Nemanja Nenadić from Transparency Serbia for N1 says that the differences between the rules prescribed by the Law on Public Procurement and this…
... detaljnije ...Serbia continues to fall on global list of Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index
In Serbia, there is no political will to reduce corruption; the Government bypasses laws on public procurement, passes special laws for multimillion-projects that are important to it, does not adopt an anti-corruption strategy, and is increasingly distant from the rule of law. It was said at the Transparency of Serbia…
... detaljnije ...TS calls on MIA and HPPO to publish additional information on their actions regarding election irregularities
The information presented to the public by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-Government (MSALSG), as well as the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (HPPO) in Belgrade, regarding allegations of illegality in the electoral list and vote buying, are not sufficient to dispel publicly…
... detaljnije ...Alarm over indications of serious election breaches
Transparency International urgently calls on the Serbian authorities to investigate potential abuses of public office and resources by the ruling party during the 17 December elections. It is also crucial to swiftly determine whether vote-buying took place. The prosecution and the Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) need to promptly…
... detaljnije ...In the election campaign, blurred line between state and the party - a sharp and valuable report by ODIHR
The observation mission of the ODIHR already in the preliminary Report highlighted not only the shortcomings of legal solutions but also numerous severe violations of the law during the campaign and election day, among which are problems for which Transparency Serbia has been proposing concrete solutions for years. The International Election…
... detaljnije ...Unfulfilled obligations and priorities for the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December, is a good reason to call on the Parliament and the Government, which will be formed after the upcoming elections, to finally adopt one of the most effective mechanisms for the fight against corruption - the introduction of illegal enrichment, as a criminal offence…
... detaljnije ...EC report – benevolent conclusion on progress and numerous unresolved problems
The European Commission's assessment[1] of Serbia's "limited progress" in the fight against corruption is too benevolent. On the other hand, the EC report is significant, as it points to some of the most important unresolved issues, including direct contracting of procurement for infrastructure projects, illegal acting state in public administration…
... detaljnije ...The work of temporary bodies during the election campaign must be transparent
Transparency Serbia has indicated to the presidents and members of temporary working bodies in 65 cities and municipalities that they have an obligation to ensure the publicity of their work by allowing journalists to attend the sessions and publishing the explanations for the decisions they make. Based on the Law on…
... detaljnije ...Violations marked the introduction to local elections
Information about the fact that the leaders of around 70 cities and municipalities submitted their resignations – meaning their mandate ended – cannot be found on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website. It means that the assemblies of these cities and municipalities violated the legal obligation. An even bigger…
... detaljnije ...
The amendment to the Law on Electronic Media does not solve the problem of "public officials' campaign"
The provision of the Law on Electronic Media, passed today, even with the amendment that was adopted by the Parliamentary Information Committee – allegedly to fulfil the ODIHR recommendation – does not solve the problems related to the promotional activities of public officials and does not represent the fulfilment of…
... detaljnije ...An amendment to prevent procurement for EXPO 2027 from being conducted without applying the Law on Public Procurement
Transparency Serbia has submitted to parliamentary groups in the Parliament of Serbia a proposal for an amendment to the Special Law on EXPO 2027 that would remove one of the significant corruption risks by obliging the special companies that will be formed for the implementation of the project to apply…
... detaljnije ...Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište the Most Transparent Local Governments in 2023
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište are the most transparent local governments in 2023 according to the Local Transparency Index published today by Transparency Serbia, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Since 2015, the Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments…
... detaljnije ...No public procurement for EXPO 2027 project
Works for the construction of the exhibition area for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure – the value of which could amount to one billion euros – will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which…
... detaljnije ...Which Local Governments Were the Most Transparent in Serbia in 2023?
On October 13, 2023, Transparency Serbia and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) will present the results of the 2023 Local Transparency Index (LTI). The Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments and 25 city municipalities in Serbia each year since 2015 and tracks…
... detaljnije ...EPS illegally withholds information
EPS AD (Electric Power Company of Serbia), joint stock company unlawfully withholds essential information from the public about its work and the possible disposing of the assets of great value. Transparency Serbia, since 26 May 2023, has been trying to verify with the Electric Power Company of Serbia the allegations…
... detaljnije ...On amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption
The draft amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption[1], presented for public discussion, respond to the GRECO's recommendations for Serbia[2] to a limited extent. On the other hand, it does not contain measures to reduce the scope of the "official campaign" and to increase the capacity of control…
... detaljnije ...The new draft law on the management of state-owned enterprises still needs amendments
The new proposal of the Law on the Management of Public Enterprises Owned by the Republic of Serbia is better than the previously withdrawn one. Still, it also needs to be amended, primarily in the area related to preventing misuse of public resources during the election campaign, transitional provisions and…
... detaljnije ...Corrupt risks of free conversion not taken into account
Amendments to the Law on Planning and Construction carry a high corruption risk because the state is giving up potential public revenues in favour of individual companies and, at the same time, threatens legal certainty and equality before the law. The amendments provide for the free conversion of the "right of…
... detaljnije ...What needs to be fixed in the proposal of the law on the management of state enterprises
Transparency Serbia sent the Government of Serbia, the Ministry of Economy and the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption a detailed analysis of corruption risks and other shortcomings in the draft law on managing business companies owned by the Republic of Serbia (SOE). The proposal for a law on companies owned…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3