Unusual post on the Agency’s website
We spotted an unusual post on the website of Agency for fight against corruption, on February the 21st. The declamation was already in the title “The president of the Republic of Serbia did not break the Law on Anticorruption Agency”. From one point of view, we can praise the fact that Agency reacted quickly on the claims that are made or doubts that the high official broke the rules about which the Agency is or should be competent. However, that act was very unusual. Declamations and doubts about breaking the Law on Anticorruption Agency by the high officials in media and public are made on an everyday basis, but about those the Agency does not comment publically.
At the first glance, the explanation could be, that the Agency’s comment was “regarding report”, which was made. However, even if that is correct, the post is still unusual, because there is no practice that the Agency in other cases makes this kind of a statement on their website, when the possible violations are reported by officials or political parties. For example – Transparency Serbia has pointed to possible violations of the article 29 of the Law on Anticorruption Agency several times, inter alia in correlation with acts by the officials of the Belgrade and members of the Government, about which we got answers and opinion of the Agency, but they are not published on the Agency’s website.
The reader of the post, which was published by a lot of media, has no information about who submitted the report about the possible violation of law by the president, nor, more importantly, on which violations that report point out. Thanks to exhaustive press clipping, we managed to find that was the report made by the group of organizations under the common name „Civil front“, and the news about the filled report was submitted by several media.
They asked the Agency to determine if article 29 of the Law, is violated and which quotes “an official may perform a function in a political party, or political entity and to participate in its activities if that does not violate the preformation of the public function and if that is not by the law forbidden”. With that article, it is foreseen that the official cannot use the public resources and gatherings on which he participates, and meetings that he goes to as an official, for the promotion of political parties, or that official may be excluded from this provision only if it uses public resources to protect personal safety.” The fact is that information about the campaign is broadcasted on the internet portal www.vucic.rs, on which there are contents about party activities of President of Serbia, which by our conviction represents the violation of the article 29, paragraph 2 of Law on Anticorruption Agency”, was the declamation of organization Civil Front in the request addressed to the Agency. They added that they are convinced that President Vučić has violated the Law when he went to media with comments about leaders of political parties and movements, at the beginning of the campaign.
In the end, they suggested the Agency for fight against the corruption to initiate the procedure in accordance with its authority, and in accordance with the law. The request was signed by: Bureau for Social Research, Initiative “Ne davimo Beograd”, the association of free tenants movement from Niš, as well as citizens’ association “Naš grad naša stvar” from Zrenjanin, “Lokalni front Va” from Valjevo, “Lokalnaalternativa” from Vrbas, “Lokalnaalternativa”, from Bečej and “Samojako” from Mladenovac.
What did the Agency announce on that occasion? First of all, “that in the concrete situation the President is performing the Constitutional authorization, and that there is no word about activities regarding promotion of political parties by using the public resources”. Representation of the Republic of Serbia in the country and abroad is one of the constitutional authorities of President of Serbia. Neither the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, nor Law of the President of the Republic specifies in details what the representation of country includes. On this basis, the Agency is stating that in the campaign “BudućnostSrbije” Law of Agency for fight against corruption is not violated.
Furthermore, that “internet portal www.vucic.rs, on which the submitter of request points out, is not the public resource, therefore publishing information about the campaign “BudućnostSrbije” does not represent the violation of Law of Agency.
And third, in correlation with the statement from the request that the President of the Republic “commented leaders of political parties and movements”, the Agency points out that the official, elected directly by the citizens, is excluded from the obligation to provide unambiguously to interlocutors and the public if they are representing the attitude of the body in which they perform public function or the attitude of political party, or political subject.
From all of the above, it could be concluded that the Agency received the request on possible violation the Law, after which the Agency conducted the procedure, and in the procedure established the facts and on that basis concluded that there was no violation of regulations from the agency’s jurisdiction. However, it is not visible, on which facts the Agency stated its conclusion. So, according to first point, from constitution regulation, that the President represents the country in the country and abroad, Agency practically concludes that Aleksandar Vučić within the campaign “BudućnostSrbije”, performed as the President that he is and in that occasion in front of the citizens of Vranje, Pančevo, Šabac and many other cities “represented the Republic of Serbia”. That is after all possible, but it would probably be necessary, in order to establish the facts, that the Agency came into possession of information through about the purpose of the campaign.
Regarding the second point, that the internet portal www.vucic.rsis undoubtedly not the public resource, it should be determined whose resource is it then. Even though it is not a public resource, it matters from the application of the law point of view, is it a personal website of Aleksandar Vučić, the portal in the possession of his political party or the third party property.
Namely, as publishing the party’s content on state website would be controversial from one reason, so would be publishing the content related to the performance the state function on party’s or personal website could be controversial on another basis.
Finally, the Agency is completely right in the part that Aleksandar Vučić is not in obligation to undoubtedly presents the interlocutors and the public whether it is the position of the state body or the position of its party because it is a citizen-elected official. That is one of the most serious lacks of article 29 of Law on Anti-corruption Agency. That provision is suitable for deputies, and local deputies, who have been elected on the function from party lists and who continue to perform their function representing the interests of their political parties, but not for the president of the Republic or for President of National Assembly, who after election to these functions represent unity of the country, that is, the institution they lead.
Regarding that, we remind that Transparency Serbia in many occasions suggested how to preformulate this regulation, last time this summer, during the discussion about the new law which will regulate this field.
When comparing the news about possible violations of the Law and the Agency’s publication, it can be noticed that there are some questions which are not directly answered, or examined. That is the question of using the public resource and using the gatherings on which the official participates, and meetings he has as the president for promotion of political parties. In other words, judging the publicated request, the Agency was supposed to examine and establish other facts other than those mentioned in the announcement.
Primarily, is the gathering on which the president of the Republic A. Vučić participated in that manner (which is, obviously for the Agency undoubtedly), at the same time used for parties purposes. So, the exception from the article 29, paragraph 5 of the Law on Anticorruption Agency, which relates to officials elected by the citizens do not have to undoubtedly point out to interlocutors in what capacity they speak (and in that way to remove the dilemma), that does not mean that they can use meetings where they participate as state officials (when there is no dilemma with the listener) for party purposes.
News
Business Integrity Country Agenda – BICA Assessment Report Serbia
Transparency Serbia presented the Report on conditions for business with integrity in Serbia.[1]The assessment is based on the methodology that was developed by Transparency International (TI) and until 2020 was implemented in a dozen countries. The analysis is structured into 15 thematic areas, comprising a total of 51 indicators and…
... detaljnije ...International Anti-Corruption Day: Pandemic further weakened anti-corruption mechanisms in Serbia
Serbia is marking December 9, International Anti-Corruption Day, without progress in key areas, and with the pandemic crisis further weakening anti-corruption mechanisms. The crisis caused by the pandemic in Serbia has led to further restrictions in access to information and violations of public procurement rules. This year was another in a series…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia proposed anti-corruption priorities for the new Parliament and Government
Transparency Serbia submitted proposals for priorities in the fight against corruption to the newly elected leaders of the National Assembly and parliamentary committees, as well as the prime minister-designate, as it did after the previous election processes. The proposals include measures that should be implemented by the legislature, but also by…
... detaljnije ...Important messages for the fight against corruption in the report of the European Commission
Transparency - Serbia points that the latest report of the European Commission[1]gives great importance to corruption as a problem for Serbia's progress on the European path, and confirms that state authorities have not implemented numerous laws and plans to fight corruption. In addition to the fact that the word "corruption…
... detaljnije ...Transparency International on International Right to Know Day
The right to know is crucial in a crisis COVID-19 is no reason for restrictions on freedom of information This International Right to Know Day, we call on all governments and public authorities to ensure that the ongoing COVID-19 crisis is not a pretext for limiting citizens’ right to information. Legal and practical processes for…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia submitted a proposal to delete illegal representatives of state-owned companies from the register
Of the 34 state-owned enterprises to which the Law on Public Enterprises applies, only nine have directors selected in a competition, as required by law, while 22 are led by acting directors. In three other companies, it was not possible to determine the status of the director. In 22 cases where…
... detaljnije ...The prosecutor did not investigate whether Drobnjak abused his position in Kukulovce
The Special Department for the Suppression of Corruption of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office (HPP) in Nis dismissed the criminal complaint of the organization Transparency Serbia against Zoran Drobnjak, the acting director of the SOE "Roads of Serbia"without valid arguments. The complaint reffers to giving bribes in connection with thevoting…
... detaljnije ...Illegal concealment of medical procurement documents
Documents on how public funds are spent on the procurement of medical equipment are twice concealed – The Serbian Government marked them as "strictly confidential” and the procurements were conducted without following the law, it is shown in response from the National Health Insurance Fund to TS. Despite the fact that…
... detaljnije ...Just one point below the line
The very fact that the government of Serbia (i.e. the prime minister’s office) analyzed the content of a report related to the situation in Serbia is, regardless of how incomplete their analysis was (which will be discussed further), a sign of progress compared to the usual flat assessments and outright…
... detaljnije ...The Government should react to negative assessments by solving the identified problems
Coalition prEUgovor welcomes the interest shown by the Government of Serbia in the findings of the ALARM report, which this group of civil society organizations has been publishing every six months for seven years, following the situation in the areas related to Chapter 23 (judiciary, anti-corruption, fundamental rights) and 24…
... detaljnije ...
Reporting on police repression of corruption in Serbia October 2019-March 2020: predominantly small and mid-level cases
Law enforcement informed the public about number of arrests, mostly covering small and mid-level corruption cases, but also few where the illicit gain or rank of perpetuator was higher. prEUgovor member Transparency Serbia prepared an overview of the reported repressive actions during the last six months. The Government web-based platform includes a section…
... detaljnije ...TS addresses parliamentarians
Transparency Serbia - TS (part of the Transparency International network) urged MPs to ask the Serbian government representatives at a parliamentary session on April 28th 2020, to publish information on procurement conducted without application of the Law on Public Procurement during the state of emergency to fight the COVID-19 pandemic…
... detaljnije ...TS calls for procurement transparency in Serbia
Transparency Serbia (TS) requested that all state and medical institutions publish vital information about everything obtained during the state of emergency that was not in line with the Law on Public Procurements. TS said that instead of being available at the official public procurement website, information about buying medical equipment came…
... detaljnije ...Serbian Government Decree - Unlawful Restriction of Rights
Serbian Government decree on informing the population about the condition and consequences of infectious disease COVID-19 - banning anyone but the Crisis Staff from releasing information about the coronavirus pandemic, was reasonably interpreted as an expression of the intention to control the flow of information between health care institutions and…
... detaljnije ...Emergency procedure - why is it important?
There is no doubt that most MPs would have voted for a declaration of a state of emergency in Serbia if the Assembly had gathered, thus at first glance, in the current situation the fact that the act of proclamation of a state of emergency was jointly adopted by the…
... detaljnije ...Reforming public procurement crucial for fighting corruption in the Western Balkans
Public procurement system in the Western Balkans is one of the critical corruption zones – as the government mechanism for buying everything “from a needle to a locomotive” it has been for a long time considered as such by the European Commission, and with a good reason. In the region with…
... detaljnije ...Investments in realization of non-existent plan
The Minister of Finance announced that the proceeds from the sale of “Komercijalna Banka” will be invested "in a smart way" and "primarily in the investment plan ‘Serbia 2025’ ".These 400 million euros may be used wisely but certainly not on the basis of the "Serbia 2025 Investment Plan", because…
... detaljnije ...“Special law” discharges most valuable public procurement
The Law on Special Procedures for the Implementation of Projects for the Construction and Reconstruction of Line Infrastructure Facilities of Particular Importance for the Republic of Serbia, whose proposal is before MPs, is yet another in a series of acts that may have the purpose and certainly result in undermining…
... detaljnije ...Harmful Consequences of Non-Transparency in Public Property Management
Transparency Serbia considers as extremely useful that the State Audit Institution audited the purposefulness of leasing public property. The findings of the SAI illustrate well the findings of the Local Government Transparency Index for 2019[1]. TS found that 86.9% of municipality units posted calls for leases on their sites, and that…
... detaljnije ...Serbian investigative reporter prevented from speaking at UN anti-corruption conference in Abu Dhabi
Statement from the UNCAC Coalition Issued by Transparency International Secretariat Award-winning Serbian journalist Stevan Dojčinović, founder and editor-in-chief of the Crime and Corruption Reporting Network KRIK, was detained at Abu Dhabi International Airport early Wednesday morning. He was arriving in the United Arab Emirates to speak at a major UN anti-corruption event, the Conference…
... detaljnije ...
About anticorruption laws on the International anticorruption day
Transparency Serbia is urging MPs to substantially improve four anti-corruption laws at the session that begins today, on an International Anti-Corruption Day, so that the possibility of misuse of public resources and public office gets curbed. The Government has proposed amendments to several articles in the Law on the Anti-Corruption Agency…
... detaljnije ...Whistleblower from Krušik
Faith of potential criminal procedure against whistleblower from „Krušik“ for „revealing of business secret“ depends on several elements. First from the fact on whether the data he provided to the press even had a status of „business secret“. Whether, in other words, that was the information with commercial value because…
... detaljnije ...Report of the Coalition prEUgovor about the progress of Serbia in chapters 23 and 24
Coalition prEUgovor ascertained in the latest report on fulfilling of criteria for chapters 23 and 24 that tendency of degrading continues, that authorities’ only concern is whether the opposition will boycott the elections, therefore functioning of institutions, rule of law and establishing of social consensus are not the priorities. The summary…
... detaljnije ...Statement on donations for sport teams – confessing the abuse of public resources
Statement of the Minister of Finances that since 2014 by today two of the largest football and basketball equips „received from the state“ around 4,7 billion of RSD, represents confession that donations were accompanied by the abuse of official post or trading with influence. According to this statement, that was not…
... detaljnije ...Minister announced, ministry doesn’t know what he is talking about
Minister of Finances Siniša Mali stated in April 2019 that study of justification of constructing the national football stadium will be finalized by 10 May 2019. TS requested from the Ministry of Finances by the beginning of May information–to whom, how, in which procedure was entrusted drafting of study, copy…
... detaljnije ...Making public debate truly public
Transparency Serbia considers as inappropriate that Ministries’ and Government’s group for promotion of election process hasn’t made any effort to enable wider public and stakeholders to participate public debate on changes of three laws, and especially the media. Public debate on changes of the Law on Anticorruption Agency, on public enterprises…
... detaljnije ...Changes of the Law on Financing Political Activities
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) finds it useful that draft of amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities regulates duty of Anticorruption Agency to proceed by complaints during the election campaign in five days deadline, to determine whether there have been violations of regulations and to publish…
... detaljnije ...International Right to Know Day
This years 28 September, International Right to Know Day, we welcomed in Serbia in a much better mood than in previous year. Namely, in one of the several meetings that were dedicated to the right to access to information, representatives of the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-governance implied…
... detaljnije ...Problem of the "officials’ campaigns" remains unresolved
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) emphasizes that interpretations that adoption of the Conclusion of the Government, prohibited or limited "officials’ campaigns",are wrong. More strict regulations could be introduced only with Law, and the chances to do so, on the basis of specific proposals of the amendments formulated by…
... detaljnije ...Final account
Transparency Serbia pointed out that delivering of final budget account to the NA, which has finally happened after more than four years, is only one of the things that Ministry of Finances and the Government had to do in order to make the budget related proceedings more transparent and accountable. According to…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3