Serbian Government Decree - Unlawful Restriction of Rights
Serbian Government decree on informing the population about the condition and consequences of infectious disease COVID-19 - banning anyone but the Crisis Staff from releasing information about the coronavirus pandemic, was reasonably interpreted as an expression of the intention to control the flow of information between health care institutions and the general public. Whether the Government really intended to introduce censorship or it was an ill-conceived attempt to suppress the dissemination of misinformation, the fact is that issues relating to the Constitution and the law cannot be regulated by a government's decree, even in a state of emergency. Therefore, even if someone had violated this decree, which would be withdrawn after only two days, could not have borne the harmful consequences..
Transparency Serbia points out that, under the Law on the Protection of Population from Infectious Diseases, "public health bodies and institutes" are obliged to "inform the population and health professionals", and this obligation cannot be abolished by a governmentdecree.[1] Basically, the problem is that the decree prevents citizens from being precisely informed by those who, by default have such information and can verify the accuracy of information(i.e. executives and other employees of health institutions.)
For example, there is no reason to assume that the Crisis Staff could have more accurate data than director of any hospital on how many infected people were already admitted toa hospital, how many tests were performed, etc. On the other hand, it is very plausible that only the Crisis Staff can provide information related to the current health situation in the whole country and that whoever looks for such consolidateddata will ask the Crisis Staff for them.
During a state of emergency, the Government can issue decrees that regulate matters of a legal nature and even can restrict certain constitutional rights (e.g.freedom of movement). However, even then the Government is not authorized to regulate legal relations in any way other than officially regulated.
All decisions that the Government has been taking in the current state of emergency are legally in dispute. Namely, the Government is currently drawing on its powers from the decision to declare a state of emergency, jointly adopted by the President of Serbia, Prime Minister and the National Assembly. However, their constitutional authority to declare a state of emergency in this way actually depends on whether the National Assembly can meet.
Evidently[2], the President of the National Parliament did not even attempt to gather her fellow MPs before the state of emergency was declared, neither the gathering of the majority of the deputies took place within the subsequent constitutional deadline of 48 hours neither. There are numerous examples that Serbian MPs were not actually prevented to fulfill their constitutional obligations but the vast majority of them rather consciously surrendered their power to the President and the Government. As a consequence, some important decisionswere adopted along with the COVID19 infection protection measures.
Although the Government probably wanted, with this decree, to prevent local authorities and local health care institutions from providing information to the media through statements and press releases, these measures would also undermine the implementation of the Law on Free Access to Information.
Since the right of access to information can only be restricted by law, in a situation when an access to information was requested by a citizen from the Clinical Centre of Niš or from the Mayor of Valjevo, for example, they would not be able to legally withhold such information finding an excuse in this Government decree. According to the law, persons authorized by local authorities and institutionsto give information should not suffer negative consequences due to their actions (if they provide such information).
Not only can the right of access to information not be restricted by the Government decree, but in these extraordinary circumstances citizens have the right to exercise it faster than usual. More precisely, ”if the request regards information, which is presumed to be of relevance to the protection of a person's life or freedom, i.e. to the protection of public health and the environment, the public authority must inform the applicant it holds such information, allow insight in the document containing the requested information i.e. issue a copy of the document to the applicant within 48 hours upon receipt of the request.”[3]
In practice, these obligations are violated. For example, on March 13, 2020, Transparency Serbia requested from the Government of Serbia, access to information of public interest regarding the alleged confidentiality of data aboutnumber of respirators (ventilators) on disposal. In this request, Transparency Serbia alsohighlighted that in order to establish trust between citizens and public, authorities should published such data within 48 hours. The response from the Government did not arrive even 20 days upon receipt of the request.
[1]SG RS 15/2016., https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_zastiti_stanovnistva_od_zaraznih_bolesti.html
[2][2]https://www.transparentnost.org.rs/index.php/sr/aktivnosti-2/pod-lupom/11213-procedura-proglasenja-vanrednog-stanja-zasto-je-vazno
[3]Law on Free Access to Information, Article 16
News
Business Integrity Country Agenda – BICA Assessment Report Serbia
Transparency Serbia presented the Report on conditions for business with integrity in Serbia.[1]The assessment is based on the methodology that was developed by Transparency International (TI) and until 2020 was implemented in a dozen countries. The analysis is structured into 15 thematic areas, comprising a total of 51 indicators and…
... detaljnije ...International Anti-Corruption Day: Pandemic further weakened anti-corruption mechanisms in Serbia
Serbia is marking December 9, International Anti-Corruption Day, without progress in key areas, and with the pandemic crisis further weakening anti-corruption mechanisms. The crisis caused by the pandemic in Serbia has led to further restrictions in access to information and violations of public procurement rules. This year was another in a series…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia proposed anti-corruption priorities for the new Parliament and Government
Transparency Serbia submitted proposals for priorities in the fight against corruption to the newly elected leaders of the National Assembly and parliamentary committees, as well as the prime minister-designate, as it did after the previous election processes. The proposals include measures that should be implemented by the legislature, but also by…
... detaljnije ...Important messages for the fight against corruption in the report of the European Commission
Transparency - Serbia points that the latest report of the European Commission[1]gives great importance to corruption as a problem for Serbia's progress on the European path, and confirms that state authorities have not implemented numerous laws and plans to fight corruption. In addition to the fact that the word "corruption…
... detaljnije ...Transparency International on International Right to Know Day
The right to know is crucial in a crisis COVID-19 is no reason for restrictions on freedom of information This International Right to Know Day, we call on all governments and public authorities to ensure that the ongoing COVID-19 crisis is not a pretext for limiting citizens’ right to information. Legal and practical processes for…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia submitted a proposal to delete illegal representatives of state-owned companies from the register
Of the 34 state-owned enterprises to which the Law on Public Enterprises applies, only nine have directors selected in a competition, as required by law, while 22 are led by acting directors. In three other companies, it was not possible to determine the status of the director. In 22 cases where…
... detaljnije ...The prosecutor did not investigate whether Drobnjak abused his position in Kukulovce
The Special Department for the Suppression of Corruption of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office (HPP) in Nis dismissed the criminal complaint of the organization Transparency Serbia against Zoran Drobnjak, the acting director of the SOE "Roads of Serbia"without valid arguments. The complaint reffers to giving bribes in connection with thevoting…
... detaljnije ...Illegal concealment of medical procurement documents
Documents on how public funds are spent on the procurement of medical equipment are twice concealed – The Serbian Government marked them as "strictly confidential” and the procurements were conducted without following the law, it is shown in response from the National Health Insurance Fund to TS. Despite the fact that…
... detaljnije ...Just one point below the line
The very fact that the government of Serbia (i.e. the prime minister’s office) analyzed the content of a report related to the situation in Serbia is, regardless of how incomplete their analysis was (which will be discussed further), a sign of progress compared to the usual flat assessments and outright…
... detaljnije ...The Government should react to negative assessments by solving the identified problems
Coalition prEUgovor welcomes the interest shown by the Government of Serbia in the findings of the ALARM report, which this group of civil society organizations has been publishing every six months for seven years, following the situation in the areas related to Chapter 23 (judiciary, anti-corruption, fundamental rights) and 24…
... detaljnije ...
Reporting on police repression of corruption in Serbia October 2019-March 2020: predominantly small and mid-level cases
Law enforcement informed the public about number of arrests, mostly covering small and mid-level corruption cases, but also few where the illicit gain or rank of perpetuator was higher. prEUgovor member Transparency Serbia prepared an overview of the reported repressive actions during the last six months. The Government web-based platform includes a section…
... detaljnije ...TS addresses parliamentarians
Transparency Serbia - TS (part of the Transparency International network) urged MPs to ask the Serbian government representatives at a parliamentary session on April 28th 2020, to publish information on procurement conducted without application of the Law on Public Procurement during the state of emergency to fight the COVID-19 pandemic…
... detaljnije ...TS calls for procurement transparency in Serbia
Transparency Serbia (TS) requested that all state and medical institutions publish vital information about everything obtained during the state of emergency that was not in line with the Law on Public Procurements. TS said that instead of being available at the official public procurement website, information about buying medical equipment came…
... detaljnije ...Serbian Government Decree - Unlawful Restriction of Rights
Serbian Government decree on informing the population about the condition and consequences of infectious disease COVID-19 - banning anyone but the Crisis Staff from releasing information about the coronavirus pandemic, was reasonably interpreted as an expression of the intention to control the flow of information between health care institutions and…
... detaljnije ...Emergency procedure - why is it important?
There is no doubt that most MPs would have voted for a declaration of a state of emergency in Serbia if the Assembly had gathered, thus at first glance, in the current situation the fact that the act of proclamation of a state of emergency was jointly adopted by the…
... detaljnije ...Reforming public procurement crucial for fighting corruption in the Western Balkans
Public procurement system in the Western Balkans is one of the critical corruption zones – as the government mechanism for buying everything “from a needle to a locomotive” it has been for a long time considered as such by the European Commission, and with a good reason. In the region with…
... detaljnije ...Investments in realization of non-existent plan
The Minister of Finance announced that the proceeds from the sale of “Komercijalna Banka” will be invested "in a smart way" and "primarily in the investment plan ‘Serbia 2025’ ".These 400 million euros may be used wisely but certainly not on the basis of the "Serbia 2025 Investment Plan", because…
... detaljnije ...“Special law” discharges most valuable public procurement
The Law on Special Procedures for the Implementation of Projects for the Construction and Reconstruction of Line Infrastructure Facilities of Particular Importance for the Republic of Serbia, whose proposal is before MPs, is yet another in a series of acts that may have the purpose and certainly result in undermining…
... detaljnije ...Harmful Consequences of Non-Transparency in Public Property Management
Transparency Serbia considers as extremely useful that the State Audit Institution audited the purposefulness of leasing public property. The findings of the SAI illustrate well the findings of the Local Government Transparency Index for 2019[1]. TS found that 86.9% of municipality units posted calls for leases on their sites, and that…
... detaljnije ...Serbian investigative reporter prevented from speaking at UN anti-corruption conference in Abu Dhabi
Statement from the UNCAC Coalition Issued by Transparency International Secretariat Award-winning Serbian journalist Stevan Dojčinović, founder and editor-in-chief of the Crime and Corruption Reporting Network KRIK, was detained at Abu Dhabi International Airport early Wednesday morning. He was arriving in the United Arab Emirates to speak at a major UN anti-corruption event, the Conference…
... detaljnije ...
About anticorruption laws on the International anticorruption day
Transparency Serbia is urging MPs to substantially improve four anti-corruption laws at the session that begins today, on an International Anti-Corruption Day, so that the possibility of misuse of public resources and public office gets curbed. The Government has proposed amendments to several articles in the Law on the Anti-Corruption Agency…
... detaljnije ...Whistleblower from Krušik
Faith of potential criminal procedure against whistleblower from „Krušik“ for „revealing of business secret“ depends on several elements. First from the fact on whether the data he provided to the press even had a status of „business secret“. Whether, in other words, that was the information with commercial value because…
... detaljnije ...Report of the Coalition prEUgovor about the progress of Serbia in chapters 23 and 24
Coalition prEUgovor ascertained in the latest report on fulfilling of criteria for chapters 23 and 24 that tendency of degrading continues, that authorities’ only concern is whether the opposition will boycott the elections, therefore functioning of institutions, rule of law and establishing of social consensus are not the priorities. The summary…
... detaljnije ...Statement on donations for sport teams – confessing the abuse of public resources
Statement of the Minister of Finances that since 2014 by today two of the largest football and basketball equips „received from the state“ around 4,7 billion of RSD, represents confession that donations were accompanied by the abuse of official post or trading with influence. According to this statement, that was not…
... detaljnije ...Minister announced, ministry doesn’t know what he is talking about
Minister of Finances Siniša Mali stated in April 2019 that study of justification of constructing the national football stadium will be finalized by 10 May 2019. TS requested from the Ministry of Finances by the beginning of May information–to whom, how, in which procedure was entrusted drafting of study, copy…
... detaljnije ...Making public debate truly public
Transparency Serbia considers as inappropriate that Ministries’ and Government’s group for promotion of election process hasn’t made any effort to enable wider public and stakeholders to participate public debate on changes of three laws, and especially the media. Public debate on changes of the Law on Anticorruption Agency, on public enterprises…
... detaljnije ...Changes of the Law on Financing Political Activities
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) finds it useful that draft of amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities regulates duty of Anticorruption Agency to proceed by complaints during the election campaign in five days deadline, to determine whether there have been violations of regulations and to publish…
... detaljnije ...International Right to Know Day
This years 28 September, International Right to Know Day, we welcomed in Serbia in a much better mood than in previous year. Namely, in one of the several meetings that were dedicated to the right to access to information, representatives of the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-governance implied…
... detaljnije ...Problem of the "officials’ campaigns" remains unresolved
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) emphasizes that interpretations that adoption of the Conclusion of the Government, prohibited or limited "officials’ campaigns",are wrong. More strict regulations could be introduced only with Law, and the chances to do so, on the basis of specific proposals of the amendments formulated by…
... detaljnije ...Final account
Transparency Serbia pointed out that delivering of final budget account to the NA, which has finally happened after more than four years, is only one of the things that Ministry of Finances and the Government had to do in order to make the budget related proceedings more transparent and accountable. According to…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3