Important messages for the fight against corruption in the report of the European Commission
Transparency - Serbia points that the latest report of the European Commission[1]gives great importance to corruption as a problem for Serbia's progress on the European path, and confirms that state authorities have not implemented numerous laws and plans to fight corruption. In addition to the fact that the word "corruption" is mentioned as many as 77 times in this year's report, the importance given to this problem is confirmed by the fact that it is discussed in relation to all key conditions of EU integration - within political criteria, rule of law, economic development and public administration.
This year's report, more clearly than ever before, shows the unacceptable practice of public procurement and public-private partnerships being contracted on the basis of interstate agreements and special procedures for selecting "strategic partners" in infrastructure projects of "national importance", instead onprocedures prescribed by the law. The EC also reminded of the obligation that Serbia did not respect - to ensure the application of the legal principles of transparency and competition for urgent procurements related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Equally important are the call to improve campaign finance rules and the reminderof unfulfilled ODIHR recommendations. The "blurred line” between a public function and a pre-election promotion" in the case of the President of the Republic in the last elections was explicitly highlighted. The same assessment could be given to many other officials as well because, in general, there was no readiness to solve the problem of conducting a "functionary campaign" with adequate legal norms.
As for prosecuting high-level corruption, it is important that the EC reiterates its assessment of the insufficient number of convictions, and the need for proactive actions by public prosecutors. The EC specifically points to the need to protect whistleblowers in such cases, mentioning the case of “Krusik”.It should be emphasize that this is by no means the only case in which argument-based suspicions of possible corruption were presented in the media, which the prosecution did not investigate.
It is also important that the EC underlined some of the problems in the enforcement of the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance in the part of the Report that refers to the fight against corruption, because hiding information often hides corruption. However, the Report failed to clearly accent the illegal practice of the Government to ignore requests for access to information.
It is significant that the EC highlightsagain the violation of the law when it comes to the acting positions in public administration. It is omitted thoughto indicate in the Report that the same problem exists in public companies, to an even more drastic extent. However, the EC clearly calls for the problems with the management of state-owned enterprises to be resolvedand, in this context, cites a report by the Anti-Corruption Council that deals with procurement conducted by such enterprises.
In this report, the EC for the first time refers to the Law on the origin of assets and special tax.It is significantthat the Reportindicates that theimplementation of this law needs to be non-discriminatory. At the same time, the EC has passed up an opportunity to analyze the norms of the law, which do not provide guarantees that the law will be primarily aimed at potential participants in corruption.
When it comes to the work of inspections, the need for their better coordination is emphasized, but not the necessity to make their work more transparent, so that the economy and citizens can gain confidence that there is any abuse in determining who will be controlled.
General assessments of "limited progress" in the fight against corruption in the Report are based primarily on the fact that some preparations have been made for the implementation of the Law on Prevention of Corruption (e.g. employment in the Agency), although it is obvious that the conditions for law enforcement are not provided – members of The Council of the Agency should have been elected by 1 September 2020, and the procedure has not even started by then. It is also stated in the Report that preparatory actions for the implementation of the Law on Lobbying were done (bylaws, training sessions of lobbyists), but it is omitted to point out that this law in the first year of implementation did not help the public to learn more about who influences the process of drafting laws and other regulations.
[1][1]https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/serbia_report_2020.pdf
News
A call to the prosecution to react to the illegal appointment of the acting director
Transparency Serbia called on the Republic Public Prosecutor's Office (RPPO) to file a lawsuit against the violation of the law to the detriment of the public interest, i.e. to initiate an administrative dispute to challenge the legality of the decision on the retroactive appointment of Filip Radović as acting director…
... detaljnije ...In memoriam: Danilo Pejović (1965-2021)
We are sad to inform our associates that our friend and financial director of the organization, Danilo Pejović, suddenly left us. With his dedicated work in the past two decades, Danilo has made an immeasurable contribution to the establishment, strengthening and stable functioning of Transparency Serbia. In addition, Danilo left an indelible…
... detaljnije ...Without a substantial change in the behaviour of public officials and MPs, there is no rule of law
On the occasion of a series of activities of the Government of Serbia on the formal implementation of the Action Plan for Chapter 23, The National Convention on the European Union (NCEU) Working Group on Chapter 23 warns that only formal fulfillment of criteria without substantial change of behavior does…
... detaljnije ...Conference: Grand Corruption and Tailor-Made Laws in Serbia
Insufficient protection from the most severe forms of corruption in Serbia In Serbia, elements of "state capture" are recognised in two important areas - the adoption of laws with provisions that favour private interests and the prosecution of grand corruption, shows the Transparency Serbia research presented today. The existing normative and institutional…
... detaljnije ...State officials in functionary campaign ahead of local vote in Serbia
The Transparency Serbia said on Wednesday that the 17 visits of top state officials to the eastern and western towns of Zajecar and Kosjeric, respectively, ahead of the local elections there, were a part of the so-called functionary campaign. In the last four years, TS added that the officials visited the…
... detaljnije ...Open Call for Violence Against Non-Governmental Organizations Demands Sanctions and Removal of Aleksandar Martinović from the Position of the Chairman…
On the occasion of the open call for physical violence by the Member of the National Assembly, Aleksandar Martinović, civil society organizations gathered in National Convention on the European Union working groups for Chapters 23 and 24 and cross-sectoral groups for political criteria and freedom of expression and the media…
... detaljnije ...Covid-19 pandemic has weakened the ability of Serbia’s governance systems to fight corruption
Serbia’s performance on the Corruption Perceptions Index hit an eight-year low in 2020. Why has the country failed to make progress in the fight against corruption? As a Serbian citizen, it is both disappointing and unsurprising that Serbia’s performance on the Corruption Perceptions Index has reached an eight-year low and is now…
... detaljnije ...National Convention on the EU in an online dialogue with the Prime Minister
On February 22, the National Convention on the EU participated in an online dialogue with Prime Minister Ana Brnabic. The following topics were planned to be discussed: media strategies, constitutional changes and the fight against corruption. The first keynote speaker was the Prime Minister, and then three "rounds" of keynote speeches…
... detaljnije ...Transparent on amendments to the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance
On the occasion of reopening the process of amendments to the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance, The Coalition for Freedom of Access to Information submitted a request to the Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government asking to put forward all information on this process, including…
... detaljnije ...Changing the definition of "public officials" – in violation of the procedure and without considering the consequences
Transparency Serbia welcomes the fact that after our warnings[1] the proponents of the disputed authentic interpretation removed some of the most harmful consequences for the implementation of the Law on Prevention of Corruption, so that judges of the Constitutional Court, judges and deputy public prosecutors will not be removed from…
... detaljnije ...
Termination of bans, restrictions and obligations for several thousand public officials "on the back door"
Transparency Serbia (TS) warned on Tuesday that the Parliament's adoption of the proposal of the Law on Prevention of Corruption as interpreted would significantly narrow the scope of application, and called on the deputies not to accept that proposal. „Based on this ‘interpretation’, no prohibition, obligation or restriction from the law…
... detaljnije ...Initiative for determining the nullity of the contract on Prokop
The Coalition for Supervision of Public Finances and Transparency Serbia sent an initiative to the Republic Public Prosecutor's Office to initiate a procedure for determining the nullity of the contract on the construction of the railway station “Prokop”, parking and accompanying commercial facilities. This contract, concluded between the Republic Directorate…
... detaljnije ...The Property Directorate is misleading the public about Prokop
In the response to allegations of Transparency Serbia and the Coalition for Supervision of Public Finances that during the selection of a private partner for the construction of the Belgrade-Centrе railway station (Prokop), parking and accompanying commercial facilities, the Law on Public-Private Partnerships and Concessions was violated, the Republic Directorate…
... detaljnije ...Serbia is falling behind on the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index list
Transparency Serbia (a member of the international organization Transparency International) has presented today the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2020. The CPI is the most famous global ranking of countries by the perception of corruption in the public sector. Serbia is still considered the country with the high level of corruption…
... detaljnije ...Candidate for President of the Supreme Court of Serbia to state her position in relation to the upcoming constitutional changes…
The High Judicial Council (HJC) announced that it will conduct an interview with its only candidate for the presidency of the Supreme Court of Cassation (SCC) on February 9, 2021. This court is the highest court in the domestic legal system, and its future president will also be the president…
... detaljnije ...TS:Illegal choice of partner for Serbia’s railroad station, other facilities
According to the available data, the Republic Property Directorate illegally chose a private partner for the joint construction of the Belgrade-Center railway station (Prokop), parking and accompanying commercial facilities. „Besides violating the Law on Public-Private Partnership, there were no reactions from other state bodies, such as from the Government, the Ministry…
... detaljnije ...Research on Corruption Risks in Laws and "COVID regulations" and Analysis of the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament
In the second half of 2020, Transparency Serbia analyzed corruption risks in the draft laws. Starting on September 1st 2020, the ministries have an obligation to ask the Anti-Corruption Agency for an opinion on whether a draft law contains a risk of corruption. However, such an obligation exists only for…
... detaljnije ...Corruption Risks in Laws and Covid regulations
In the second half of 2020, Transparency Serbia analyzed corruption risks in the draft laws. Starting on September 1st 2020, the ministries have an obligation to ask the Anti-Corruption Agency for an opinion on whether a draft law contains a risk of corruption. However, such an obligation exists only for…
... detaljnije ...TS called on the Government of Serbia to publish the immunisation plan and declassify it
Transparency Serbia (part of the Transparency International network) today called on the Government of Serbia to publish a vaccination plan against the corona virus, i.e. to draft and publish that document if it does not already exist. In the letter to the Prime Minister Ana Brnabić, TS indicated that the public…
... detaljnije ...Business Integrity Country Agenda – BICA Assessment Report Serbia
Transparency Serbia presented the Report on conditions for business with integrity in Serbia.[1]The assessment is based on the methodology that was developed by Transparency International (TI) and until 2020 was implemented in a dozen countries. The analysis is structured into 15 thematic areas, comprising a total of 51 indicators and…
... detaljnije ...
International Anti-Corruption Day: Pandemic further weakened anti-corruption mechanisms in Serbia
Serbia is marking December 9, International Anti-Corruption Day, without progress in key areas, and with the pandemic crisis further weakening anti-corruption mechanisms. The crisis caused by the pandemic in Serbia has led to further restrictions in access to information and violations of public procurement rules. This year was another in a series…
... detaljnije ...Letter to the Assembly: Review of the report on the work of independent state bodies
Transparency Serbia today called on the Serbian Parliament to postpone discussion and adoption of work reports of independent state bodies until the competent committees formulate conclusions that would also contain clear requirements in accordance with the recommendations and problems raised by these independent state bodies in their reports. The requests…
... detaljnije ...Decision to reject the criminal complaint in the "Kukulovce" case was incorrect
The Appellate Public Prosecutor's Office (APPO) in Nis confirmed[1]our view that the decision of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (HPP) to reject the criminal complaint[2] against the former acting director of the PE "Roads of Serbia"[3] for giving bribes in connection with voting on Serbian parliamentary election (21 June 2020)…
... detaljnije ...Serbia again on GRECO list of countries whose report is "globally unsatisfactory"
The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO), established by the Council of Europe, again described Serbia's report as "globally unsatisfactory". The same assessment was given three years ago, due to the failure to implement the recommendations of this international organization regarding the prevention of corruption among MPs, judges and prosecutors…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia proposed anti-corruption priorities for the new Parliament and Government
Transparency Serbia submitted proposals for priorities in the fight against corruption to the newly elected leaders of the National Assembly and parliamentary committees, as well as the prime minister-designate, as it did after the previous election processes. The proposals include measures that should be implemented by the legislature, but also by…
... detaljnije ...Important messages for the fight against corruption in the report of the European Commission
Transparency - Serbia points that the latest report of the European Commission[1]gives great importance to corruption as a problem for Serbia's progress on the European path, and confirms that state authorities have not implemented numerous laws and plans to fight corruption. In addition to the fact that the word "corruption…
... detaljnije ...The public is still waiting for complete and verifiable information from the Information system COVID-19
Statement of the Coalition for Freedom of Access to Information Public confirmation of suspicions that inaccurate data on the number of deceased persons from COVID-19 were published during the summer, transfer of responsibility for that to unnamed "computer scientists", and absence of any reaction from those "computer scientists", the "Milan Jovanovic…
... detaljnije ...Transparency International on International Right to Know Day
The right to know is crucial in a crisis COVID-19 is no reason for restrictions on freedom of information This International Right to Know Day, we call on all governments and public authorities to ensure that the ongoing COVID-19 crisis is not a pretext for limiting citizens’ right to information. Legal and practical processes for…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia submitted a proposal to delete illegal representatives of state-owned companies from the register
Of the 34 state-owned enterprises to which the Law on Public Enterprises applies, only nine have directors selected in a competition, as required by law, while 22 are led by acting directors. In three other companies, it was not possible to determine the status of the director. In 22 cases where…
... detaljnije ...The prosecutor did not investigate whether Drobnjak abused his position in Kukulovce
The Special Department for the Suppression of Corruption of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office (HPP) in Nis dismissed the criminal complaint of the organization Transparency Serbia against Zoran Drobnjak, the acting director of the SOE "Roads of Serbia"without valid arguments. The complaint reffers to giving bribes in connection with thevoting…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
Pretraga
