“Special law” discharges most valuable public procurement
The Law on Special Procedures for the Implementation of Projects for the Construction and Reconstruction of Line Infrastructure Facilities of Particular Importance for the Republic of Serbia, whose proposal is before MPs, is yet another in a series of acts that may have the purpose and certainly result in undermining of the public procurement system. Although the new Law on Public Procurement was adopted less than a month ago, at the suggestion of the Government, in order to comply with EU rules, the bill on special procedures is being passing to enable projects worth several billion euros to be contracted under a different procedure.
This bill, like its predecessors - such as the one that was enacted in connection with The Belgrade Waterfront project, and served as a model in several later cases - follows the opposite logic: if something is "of particular importance to the Republic of Serbia", then it will be contracted to apply rules that provide less protection of public interest (especially when it comes to transparency and competition.)
Although the Draft Lawbrings a definition of "projects of particular importance",essentially it will primarily serve to cover deviations from the general rules in situations where project financing and project implementation have already been agreed or are expected to be arranged through agreements with other countries (construction of metro lines in Belgrade for example). This is also acknowledged in one part of the bill’s explanatory note questionnaire: “Is it possible to make a change by applying the actual regulations?It is possible, but the implementation period, that is, the start and end time of these projects would be significantly extended and in some situations the commitments from the signed bilateral agreements might not be fulfilled."Therefore, the adoption of this act may be a response to criticism coming from the EU regarding thenegotiations on Chapter 5 that Serbia too often uses interstate agreements as an exception to the implementation of the public procurement rules. Once this "special law" is adopted, it will serve to transform what has already been agreed with representatives of other states and their banks and companies in the form of a legal act and some sort of procedure for selecting a bidder.
The Law will apply to projects for the construction and reconstruction of public line transport infrastructure (road, rail, water and air) "of particular importance for the Republic of Serbia", and the Government is the one who will decide what projects are of that particular importance. Projects worth over € 50 million have already been identified as such, that is they will not need a Government’s special decision, and will be implemented through some form of public-private partnership.
The Draft Articles 32 to 36 stipulate that the rules on public procurement regarding “procurement plan, prior notification, manner of proving mandatory and additional conditions for participation in the public procurement procedure, deadlines for submission of tenders and deadlines for the Republic Commission for the Protection of Rights in Public Procurement Procedures to make a decision, shall not apply.”
Making exception from the obligation to plan these procurements like all others will reduce the possibility of insight into the estimated value of the procurement and into the methodology used to obtain the estimation. Shortening deadlines for the submission of bids will result in reduced competition. It will also create a space for a possibility for the contracting authority to conclude the contract, even though a request for the protection of rights has been filed, will expose the contracting authority to the risk of harm. The special law also releases the contracting authority from the obligation to ask the Public Procurement Office for an opinion on whether there are valid reasons for the use of negotiated procedure instead of an open procurement procedure.
In addition to all mentioned above, it is explicitly stated that when there are international agreements, then the rules defined in those agreements apply.
The application of the Draft Law Articles from 37 to 48 will cause the greatest disruption of the system. By these articles is stated that "especially in case of urgency and risk of the project realization" (ie, it may happen in other situations as well, and the risk is given only as an example), if a preliminary feasibility study with the general project has been already prepared, the Government may decide that the public procurement rules do not apply at all to the project or individual phases and activities of the projects, but rather "a special procedure for selecting a strategic partner for the purpose of implementing a project of particular importance for the Republic of Serbia".
The obvious intention is to tailor such special procedures to a pre-selected strategic partner. Article 39, paragraph 3, is explicitly read that the Government will issue a regulation defining rules for choosing a “strategic partner” for each project individually!
With all this in mind, the only correct move will be to withdraw this law from the procedure or to delete Articles 32 to 48 from it, and to apply the general Public Procurement Law and the Law on Public-Private Partnerships and Concessions to the construction of infrastructure projects. We also remind that the Law on Public-Private Partnerships should be significantly improved, since its actual version does not even provide fundamental level of transparency (publication of contracts, for example).
Other provisions of this special law should be also addressed systematically, that is, through possible amendments of relevant regulations, rather than by creating special rules only for one type of public purpose building.
News
Business Integrity Country Agenda – BICA Assessment Report Serbia
Transparency Serbia presented the Report on conditions for business with integrity in Serbia.[1]The assessment is based on the methodology that was developed by Transparency International (TI) and until 2020 was implemented in a dozen countries. The analysis is structured into 15 thematic areas, comprising a total of 51 indicators and…
... detaljnije ...International Anti-Corruption Day: Pandemic further weakened anti-corruption mechanisms in Serbia
Serbia is marking December 9, International Anti-Corruption Day, without progress in key areas, and with the pandemic crisis further weakening anti-corruption mechanisms. The crisis caused by the pandemic in Serbia has led to further restrictions in access to information and violations of public procurement rules. This year was another in a series…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia proposed anti-corruption priorities for the new Parliament and Government
Transparency Serbia submitted proposals for priorities in the fight against corruption to the newly elected leaders of the National Assembly and parliamentary committees, as well as the prime minister-designate, as it did after the previous election processes. The proposals include measures that should be implemented by the legislature, but also by…
... detaljnije ...Important messages for the fight against corruption in the report of the European Commission
Transparency - Serbia points that the latest report of the European Commission[1]gives great importance to corruption as a problem for Serbia's progress on the European path, and confirms that state authorities have not implemented numerous laws and plans to fight corruption. In addition to the fact that the word "corruption…
... detaljnije ...Transparency International on International Right to Know Day
The right to know is crucial in a crisis COVID-19 is no reason for restrictions on freedom of information This International Right to Know Day, we call on all governments and public authorities to ensure that the ongoing COVID-19 crisis is not a pretext for limiting citizens’ right to information. Legal and practical processes for…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia submitted a proposal to delete illegal representatives of state-owned companies from the register
Of the 34 state-owned enterprises to which the Law on Public Enterprises applies, only nine have directors selected in a competition, as required by law, while 22 are led by acting directors. In three other companies, it was not possible to determine the status of the director. In 22 cases where…
... detaljnije ...The prosecutor did not investigate whether Drobnjak abused his position in Kukulovce
The Special Department for the Suppression of Corruption of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office (HPP) in Nis dismissed the criminal complaint of the organization Transparency Serbia against Zoran Drobnjak, the acting director of the SOE "Roads of Serbia"without valid arguments. The complaint reffers to giving bribes in connection with thevoting…
... detaljnije ...Illegal concealment of medical procurement documents
Documents on how public funds are spent on the procurement of medical equipment are twice concealed – The Serbian Government marked them as "strictly confidential” and the procurements were conducted without following the law, it is shown in response from the National Health Insurance Fund to TS. Despite the fact that…
... detaljnije ...Just one point below the line
The very fact that the government of Serbia (i.e. the prime minister’s office) analyzed the content of a report related to the situation in Serbia is, regardless of how incomplete their analysis was (which will be discussed further), a sign of progress compared to the usual flat assessments and outright…
... detaljnije ...The Government should react to negative assessments by solving the identified problems
Coalition prEUgovor welcomes the interest shown by the Government of Serbia in the findings of the ALARM report, which this group of civil society organizations has been publishing every six months for seven years, following the situation in the areas related to Chapter 23 (judiciary, anti-corruption, fundamental rights) and 24…
... detaljnije ...
Reporting on police repression of corruption in Serbia October 2019-March 2020: predominantly small and mid-level cases
Law enforcement informed the public about number of arrests, mostly covering small and mid-level corruption cases, but also few where the illicit gain or rank of perpetuator was higher. prEUgovor member Transparency Serbia prepared an overview of the reported repressive actions during the last six months. The Government web-based platform includes a section…
... detaljnije ...TS addresses parliamentarians
Transparency Serbia - TS (part of the Transparency International network) urged MPs to ask the Serbian government representatives at a parliamentary session on April 28th 2020, to publish information on procurement conducted without application of the Law on Public Procurement during the state of emergency to fight the COVID-19 pandemic…
... detaljnije ...TS calls for procurement transparency in Serbia
Transparency Serbia (TS) requested that all state and medical institutions publish vital information about everything obtained during the state of emergency that was not in line with the Law on Public Procurements. TS said that instead of being available at the official public procurement website, information about buying medical equipment came…
... detaljnije ...Serbian Government Decree - Unlawful Restriction of Rights
Serbian Government decree on informing the population about the condition and consequences of infectious disease COVID-19 - banning anyone but the Crisis Staff from releasing information about the coronavirus pandemic, was reasonably interpreted as an expression of the intention to control the flow of information between health care institutions and…
... detaljnije ...Emergency procedure - why is it important?
There is no doubt that most MPs would have voted for a declaration of a state of emergency in Serbia if the Assembly had gathered, thus at first glance, in the current situation the fact that the act of proclamation of a state of emergency was jointly adopted by the…
... detaljnije ...Reforming public procurement crucial for fighting corruption in the Western Balkans
Public procurement system in the Western Balkans is one of the critical corruption zones – as the government mechanism for buying everything “from a needle to a locomotive” it has been for a long time considered as such by the European Commission, and with a good reason. In the region with…
... detaljnije ...Investments in realization of non-existent plan
The Minister of Finance announced that the proceeds from the sale of “Komercijalna Banka” will be invested "in a smart way" and "primarily in the investment plan ‘Serbia 2025’ ".These 400 million euros may be used wisely but certainly not on the basis of the "Serbia 2025 Investment Plan", because…
... detaljnije ...“Special law” discharges most valuable public procurement
The Law on Special Procedures for the Implementation of Projects for the Construction and Reconstruction of Line Infrastructure Facilities of Particular Importance for the Republic of Serbia, whose proposal is before MPs, is yet another in a series of acts that may have the purpose and certainly result in undermining…
... detaljnije ...Harmful Consequences of Non-Transparency in Public Property Management
Transparency Serbia considers as extremely useful that the State Audit Institution audited the purposefulness of leasing public property. The findings of the SAI illustrate well the findings of the Local Government Transparency Index for 2019[1]. TS found that 86.9% of municipality units posted calls for leases on their sites, and that…
... detaljnije ...Serbian investigative reporter prevented from speaking at UN anti-corruption conference in Abu Dhabi
Statement from the UNCAC Coalition Issued by Transparency International Secretariat Award-winning Serbian journalist Stevan Dojčinović, founder and editor-in-chief of the Crime and Corruption Reporting Network KRIK, was detained at Abu Dhabi International Airport early Wednesday morning. He was arriving in the United Arab Emirates to speak at a major UN anti-corruption event, the Conference…
... detaljnije ...
About anticorruption laws on the International anticorruption day
Transparency Serbia is urging MPs to substantially improve four anti-corruption laws at the session that begins today, on an International Anti-Corruption Day, so that the possibility of misuse of public resources and public office gets curbed. The Government has proposed amendments to several articles in the Law on the Anti-Corruption Agency…
... detaljnije ...Whistleblower from Krušik
Faith of potential criminal procedure against whistleblower from „Krušik“ for „revealing of business secret“ depends on several elements. First from the fact on whether the data he provided to the press even had a status of „business secret“. Whether, in other words, that was the information with commercial value because…
... detaljnije ...Report of the Coalition prEUgovor about the progress of Serbia in chapters 23 and 24
Coalition prEUgovor ascertained in the latest report on fulfilling of criteria for chapters 23 and 24 that tendency of degrading continues, that authorities’ only concern is whether the opposition will boycott the elections, therefore functioning of institutions, rule of law and establishing of social consensus are not the priorities. The summary…
... detaljnije ...Statement on donations for sport teams – confessing the abuse of public resources
Statement of the Minister of Finances that since 2014 by today two of the largest football and basketball equips „received from the state“ around 4,7 billion of RSD, represents confession that donations were accompanied by the abuse of official post or trading with influence. According to this statement, that was not…
... detaljnije ...Minister announced, ministry doesn’t know what he is talking about
Minister of Finances Siniša Mali stated in April 2019 that study of justification of constructing the national football stadium will be finalized by 10 May 2019. TS requested from the Ministry of Finances by the beginning of May information–to whom, how, in which procedure was entrusted drafting of study, copy…
... detaljnije ...Making public debate truly public
Transparency Serbia considers as inappropriate that Ministries’ and Government’s group for promotion of election process hasn’t made any effort to enable wider public and stakeholders to participate public debate on changes of three laws, and especially the media. Public debate on changes of the Law on Anticorruption Agency, on public enterprises…
... detaljnije ...Changes of the Law on Financing Political Activities
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) finds it useful that draft of amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities regulates duty of Anticorruption Agency to proceed by complaints during the election campaign in five days deadline, to determine whether there have been violations of regulations and to publish…
... detaljnije ...International Right to Know Day
This years 28 September, International Right to Know Day, we welcomed in Serbia in a much better mood than in previous year. Namely, in one of the several meetings that were dedicated to the right to access to information, representatives of the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-governance implied…
... detaljnije ...Problem of the "officials’ campaigns" remains unresolved
Transparency Serbia (official chapter of Transparency International) emphasizes that interpretations that adoption of the Conclusion of the Government, prohibited or limited "officials’ campaigns",are wrong. More strict regulations could be introduced only with Law, and the chances to do so, on the basis of specific proposals of the amendments formulated by…
... detaljnije ...Final account
Transparency Serbia pointed out that delivering of final budget account to the NA, which has finally happened after more than four years, is only one of the things that Ministry of Finances and the Government had to do in order to make the budget related proceedings more transparent and accountable. According to…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3